Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2019 Jul 18;9:10397. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46465-5

Actin depolymerization is able to increase plant resistance against pathogens via activation of salicylic acid signalling pathway

Hana Leontovyčová 1,2,4, Tetiana Kalachova 2, Lucie Trdá 2, Romana Pospíchalová 2, Lucie Lamparová 1,2, Petre I Dobrev 3, Kateřina Malínská 3, Lenka Burketová 2, Olga Valentová 1, Martin Janda 1,2,5,✉
PMCID: PMC6639534  PMID: 31320662

Abstract

The integrity of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for plant immune signalling. Consequently, it is generally assumed that actin disruption reduces plant resistance to pathogen attack. Here, we demonstrate that actin depolymerization induced a dramatic increase in salicylic acid (SA) levels in Arabidopsis thaliana. Transcriptomic analysis showed that the SA pathway was activated due to the action of isochorismate synthase (ICS). The effect was also confirmed in Brassica napus. This raises the question of whether actin depolymerization could, under particular conditions, lead to increased resistance to pathogens. Thus, we explored the effect of pretreatment with actin-depolymerizing drugs on the resistance of Arabidopsis thaliana to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, and on the resistance of an important crop Brassica napus to its natural fungal pathogen Leptosphaeria maculans. In both pathosystems, actin depolymerization activated the SA pathway, leading to increased plant resistance. To our best knowledge, we herein provide the first direct evidence that disruption of the actin cytoskeleton can actually lead to increased plant resistance to pathogens, and that SA is crucial to this process.

Subject terms: Plant hormones, Plant immunity

Introduction

The actin cytoskeleton plays a key role in plant immunity1,2, both by providing a physical barrier and by its involvement in the transport of callose, antimicrobial compounds and cell wall components to an infection site3. Additionally, actin filament reorganization is a very fast response to treatment with conserved microbial compounds, MAMPs (microbe-associated molecular patterns), such as flg22, elf26 and chitin. The recognition of MAMPs triggers a specific set of immune responses, including cytoskeleton reorganization. It underpins the important role of actin cytoskeleton in plant defense4,5. Several studies have shown that when drugs, such as cytochalasins or latrunculin B, depolymerize the actin cytoskeleton, different plant species become more susceptible to pathogens. For example, treatment of A. thaliana with latrunculin B resulted in higher susceptibility to infection by Pseudomonas syringae5–7. In plants, actin depolymerizing factors serve to sever filamentous actin. The adf4 (Actin Depolymerizing Factor 4) A. thaliana knock out mutant had reduced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC 3000 (Pst DC3000) expressing the AvrPphB effector8. This is because ADF4 is necessary for the expression of RPS5, the resistance protein that recognises AvrPphB9. However, in the intact adf4 mutant, the density and skewness of actin filaments were the same as in control plants, implying that the actin cytoskeleton is not modified before infection10. ADF4 plays an indispensable role in the actin reorganisation upon elf26, but not in response to chitin4. The importance of actin cytoskeleton is also highlighted by the fact that Pst DC3000 secretes at least two effectors modulating actin cytoskeleton. The effector HopW1 disrupts the actin cytoskeleton6,7. Another effector, HopG1, was shown to affect the remodelling of the actin cytoskeleton in Pst DC3000-infected A. thaliana11. Furthermore, treatment with cytochalasin E increased the penetration of A. thaliana plants by Colletotrichum species12 and the rate of entry to barley by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei13. Non-host resistance to Erysiphe pisi decreased after treatment with cytochalasins in barley, wheat, cucumber and tobacoo14, as did resistance to Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici after cytochalasin E treatment of A. thaliana. Moreover, treatment with cytochalasin E in the absence of EDS1 (enhanced diseased resistance 1), an upstream component of the salicylic acid (SA) signalling pathway, strongly enhanced the inhibitory effect on non-host resistance15. However, in tobacco, cytochalasin E induced the transcription of NtPR-1 (pathogenesis-related 1), a defence-related SA marker gene, and is able to prime cells to HR-like cell death in response to Erysiphe cichoracearum16. Furthermore, both cytochalasin E and latrunculin B induced the transcription of several SA marker genes (AtPR-1, AtPR-2 and AtWRKY38) in A. thaliana seedlings17. This suggests that while such drugs do indeed cause actin depolymerization, the effects of such depolymerization may not always be adverse. Could it be that drug-induced actin depolymerization actually triggers processes that induce the SA pathway and thereby increase plant resistance to pathogens?

Results

Actin depolymerization induce salicylic acid biosynthesis via ICS1 dependent pathway

To establish that SA levels can increase upon actin depolymerization, we measured phytohormone content in A. thaliana seedlings treated with just 200 nM latrunculin B. Such a low concentration of latrunculin B proved sufficient to depolymerize actin filaments in the seedlings within 24 h (Fig. S1). Additionally, we showed that 24 h treatment with latrunculin B does not induce plant cell death (Fig. S2). Significantly, by that time there was a sevenfold increase in the free SA level of the treated seedlings compared with the control ones. The only other phytohormone to display an increase (twofold) was jasmonic acid (JA). Apart from Indole-3-acetamide (IAM), which showed a threefold decrease, the other tested phytohormones remained largely unaltered (Fig. 1a; Table S1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Seedlings of A. thaliana: Latrunculin B triggers SA biosynthesis and resistance to Pst DC3000. Seedlings were grown in vitro in liquid MS medium (a–c) and seedlings were grown in vitro in solid MS/2 medium (d,e). (a) Phytohormone analysis. Seedlings were treated for 24 h with 200 nM latrunculin B (latB) or 0.01% DMSO (control). For abbreviations of analyzed phytohormones, see Table S1. (b) Transcription of SA biosynthetic genes ICS1, ICS2, PAL1, PAL2, PAL3 and PAL4. Seedlings were treated for 24 h with 200 nM latB or 0.01% DMSO. The transcription level was normalized to the reference gene, SAND. (c) Bacterial titres (liquid medium). Seedlings were pretreated for 24 h with 200 nM latB or 0.01% DMSO before inoculation with Pst DC3000. Tissue was harvested 1 day after inoculation with bacteria. (d) Bacterial titres (solid medium). Seedlings were pretreated for 24 h with 200 nM latB or 0.01% DMSO before inoculation with Pst DC3000. Tissue was harvested 1 and 2 days after inoculation with bacteria. (e) Representative photographs of seedlings grown on solid medium 2 days after inoculation with Pst DC3000. The values represent mean and error bars (SEM) from four (a,c), three to four (b) and five (d) independent samples. The asterisks represent statistically significant changes in latB-treated samples compared with controls (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; two tailed Student’s t-test).

Having shown this dramatic rise in SA level in A. thaliana, we wondered which of its two SA biosynthetic pathways was responsible for this increase or whether they both contributed to it. One pathway involves phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL, EC 4.3.1.24), which exists in four isoforms, while the other involves isochorismate synthase (ICS; EC 5.4.4.2), which occurs in two isoforms18. Analysis of the transcription of all AtPAL and AtICS genes in the seedlings revealed that only the AtICS genes were induced by latruculin B (Fig. 1b). This shows that drug-induced actin depolymerization activates the ICS-dependent pathway and that this pathway alone is responsible for SA biosynthesis under these conditions.

Actin depolymerization leads to induced resistance of A. thaliana against Pst DC3000

Given that increased resistance to pathogens in A. thaliana is associated with SA biosynthesis through the ICS pathway19,20, is it possible that activation of the same pathway invoked by drug-induced actin depolymerization also results in increased resistance? To investigate this, we used Ishiga et al.21 protocol as a basis for performing two in vitro A. thaliana-Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) flood-inoculation assays in liquid and solid media21. We treated the seedlings with latrunculin B 24 h before inoculation with Pst DC3000. Remarkably, under both conditions, the latrunculin B-pretreated seedlings were more resistant than the control ones (Fig. 1c,d,e).

To ensure that this phenomenon is not just associated with in vitro conditions, we also performed experiments using four-week-old A. thaliana plants cultivated in soil, such plants typically being used for studies of A. thaliana resistance to Pst DC300022. Unlike in the seedlings, 24 h treatment with 200 nM latrunculin B did not activate the SA pathway in the adult plants and, thus, no increased resistance was observed (Fig. 2a,b). However, the transcription of SA marker genes (AtPR-1, AtICS1) was induced after 24 h treatment with 1 µM latrunculin B (Fig. 2a), leading to increased resistance to Pst DC3000 (Fig. 2b). This suggests that plant resistance is strongly dependent on latrunculin B concentration, probably due to differences between the efficiency of latrunculin B-induced actin depolymerization in seedlings and in adult plants (Figs S1 and S3). Similar to latrunculin B, pretreatment with cytochalasin E led to both SA-induced gene transcription (Fig. S4a) and increased plant resistance to Pst DC3000 (Fig. S4b), thereby strengthening the notion that such resistance is due to the depolymerizing activity of cytoskeletal drugs. It should be noted that we exclude the antibacterial effect of latrunculin B because Pst DC3000 grew in vitro in the presence of latrunculin B at a similar rate as in the control medium (Fig. S5).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Four-week-old A. thaliana: Latruculin B-triggered SA pathway is necessary for higher resistance to Pst DC3000 (a). Transcription of SA marker genes PR-1 and ICS1 in four-week-old A. thaliana plants. Plants were treated for 24 h with 200 nM or 1 µM latrunculin B (latB). The transcription level was normalized to the reference gene, TIP41. (b,c) Bacterial titres in four-week-old plants. (b) Plants were pretreated with 200 nM or 1 µM latB for 24 h before inoculation with Pst DC3000. Control plants were pretreated with 0.01 or 0.05% DMSO. (c) Plants were treated with 1 µM latB or 0.05% DMSO, each in a solution containing Pst DC3000. (d) Bacterial titres in four-week-old plants. (e) Representative photographs of adult A. thaliana leaves infected with Pst DC3000 3 days after inoculation. (f) Salicylic acid (SA) concentration after 24 h 1 µM latB treatment. Plants were treated for 24 h with 1 µM latB or 0.05% DMSO before inoculation with Pst DC3000. A. thaliana WT plants (col-0) and mutants with impaired SA pathways (nahG and sid2) were used (d, e, f). Tissue was harvested 3 days after inoculation with Pst DC3000. The values represent mean and error bars (SEM) from four (a,f) and six (b,c,e) independent samples. The asterisks represent statistically significant changes in latB-treated samples compared with controls (**P < 0.01; two tailed Student’s t-test) and statistical differences between the samples (d,f) were assessed using a one-way ANOVA, with a Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) multiple mean comparison post hoc test. Different letters indicate a significant difference, Tukey HSD, P < 0.01, n = 6.

The induced resistance caused by actin depolymerization is dependent on salicylic acid

To further demonstrate the dependence of such resistance on the SA pathway, we performed assays using mutants known to have an impaired SA pathway and thus be more susceptible to Pst DC3000: nahG, which induces low endogenous SA levels through the expression of SA-hydroxylase23, and sid2, a knock-out mutant of the AtICS1 gene24. As expected, latrunculin B did not induce resistance in the nahG plants (Fig. 2d,e). Sid2 plants treated with latrunculin B were more resistant compared to sid2 controls. However, latrunculin B treated sid2 plants were still more susceptible than WT controls (Fig. 2e). The SA level is not induced in sid2 plants (Fig. 2f) which correlates with the fact that none of SA biosynthetic genes does have induced transcription (Fig. S6b). Contrarily in seedlings, ICS2 transcription is induced by latB (Fig. S6a). Altogether these results clearly confirm the crucial role of SA for actin depolymerization-induced resistance. However, increased resistance of latB treated sid2 mutants uncover a new possible unknown SA independent mechanism triggering immunity.

Actin depolymerization induce SA pathway in B. napus and enhance its resistance against L. maculans

To show that this phenomenon is neither species-specific nor pathogen-specific, we investigated the effect of latrunculin B on an important crop, oilseed rape (Brassica napus). As in the case of A. thaliana in B. napus, latrunculin B upregulated the transcription of SA marker genes (BnPR-1, BnICS1) (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, as with adult A. thaliana, the effect of latrunculin B on B. napus was concentration dependent (Fig. 3a). The increased transcription of BnPR-1 also occurred 72 h after latrunculin B treatment. On the other hand, BnICS1 was not induced, indicating a transient effect of actin depolymerisation on BnICS1 transcription (Fig. S7). The treatment of B. napus with 10 µM latrunculin B 3 days before inoculation with a hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, L. maculans, efficiently inhibited hyphal colonisation and necrosis formation in the infected cotyledons (Fig. 3b,c,d). Treatment with 1 µM latrunculin B led to much weaker and variable resistance against L. maculans (Fig. 3b), corresponding to the weaker transcription of defence-related genes (Fig. 3a). These data are in accordance with our previous study characterizing the importance of SA in the defence of B. napus against L. maculans25. In addition, we observed significant cytochalasin E-induced resistance to L. maculans in B. napus (Fig. S8), which suggests that the effect is not compound-specific. Furthermore, neither latrunculin B nor cytochalasin E displayed antifungal activity on L. maculans growth in vitro (Fig. S9). Interestingly, the co-inoculation of B. napus cotyledons with a joint solution of 1 and 10 µM latrunculin B and L. maculans conidia also induced resistance (Fig. 3b).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

B. napus cotyledons: Latrunculin B triggers SA pathway and resistance to L. maculans (a). Transcription of SA marker genes BnPR-1 and BnICS1 in B. napus cotyledons. Cotyledons were treated for 24 h with infiltrations of 0.2, 1 or 10 µM latrunculin B (latB). Control cotyledons were treated for 24 h with a corresponding concentration of DMSO (0.01, 0.05 or 0.5%). The transcription level was normalized to the reference gene, BnTIP41. (b) B. napus susceptibility to L. maculans was evaluated as the relative lesion area (ratio of lesion area to whole leaf area) on the cotyledons. Cotyledons were treated with latrunculin B (latB; 1 µM or 10 µM) or DMSO control (0.05 or 0.5%), either 3 days before inoculation or simultaneously to inoculation by L. maculans. Lesions of DMSO controls in each treatment conditions were set as 100%. (c) Representative images of L. maculans-infected cotyledons. (d) Representative microscopy images of L. maculans hyphae proliferation in B. napus cotyledons in response to 10 µM latB or 0.5% DMSO. The bars correspond to 500 µM. The values represent mean and error bars (SEM) from three to four (a) and 60 -142 (b) independent samples. The asterisks represent statistically significant changes in latB-treated samples compared with controls (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; two tailed Student’s t-test).

Discussion

Our results indicate that depolymerized actin can trigger resistance to bacterial or fungal pathogens

Thus, we have shown that plant immunity is strongly activated by depolymerised actin and that this phenomenon appears to be generally valid; namely, it seems not to be species specific, pathogen-type specific or drug-type specific. These findings do not negate those of previous studies that showed the susceptibility of plants treated with cytoskeletal drugs to pathogens5–7,12,13,15. Rather, they reveal that the plant disease resistance is strongly dependent on whether the plant has sufficient time to activate SA-mediated immunity (Fig. 4). This was clearly shown by our experiments with Pst DC3000, in which pre-infection treatment with cytoskeletal drugs resulted in resistance whilst co-inoculation did not (Fig. 2b,c,e). The co-inoculation of cytochalasin D and Pst DC3000 also had no effect on resistance according to Shimono et al.11. Other previous studies using actin-depolymerizing drugs showed higher susceptibility to Pst DC3000 when co-inoculation was used5–7(Fig. 4). It is also important to mention that actin filaments response to plant immunity is strongly dependent on conditions used in the study. A good example are effects of different MAMPs (flg22 and elf26) on actin reorganization. Using 24 day-old plants infiltrated with MAMPs, Henty-Ridilla et al.5 showed that treatment with flg22 induces actin reorganization, while elf26 does not5. Contradictorily to that, in epidermal cells of hypocotyl grown in the dark, Henty-Ridilla et al.4 showed that elf26 induces reorganisation and flg22 does not4 (an explanation could be that under these conditions, FLS2 receptor of flg22 is not expressed). In this study, we excluded the effect of different conditions on induced resistance of A. thaliana against Pst DC3000 by testing three different setups (Figs 1c,d and 2b,e). The result was in all cases similar, whereby pretreatment with latrunculin B induced resistance of A. thaliana against Pst DC3000.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Possible dual role of actin cytoskeleton in plant response to pathogens. (a) The widely-published scenario in which depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton by treatment with latrunculin B or cytochalasin E leads to increased plant vulnerability to pathogens. Studies showing this phenomenon co-inoculated plants with a drug and pathogen. (b) The new alternative scenario for the role of the actin cytoskeleton proposed in this manuscript. Plants pretreated with latrunculin B or cytochalasin E before inoculation with a pathogen have time to activate the salicylic acid signalling pathway, resulting in increased resistance to the subsequently inoculated pathogens. latB = latrunculin B; cytE = cytochalasin E; SA = salicylic acid; ICS1 = isochorismate synthase 1;Inline graphic = fungi; Inline graphic = bacteria.

Interestingly, treatment with latrunculin B resulted in increased resistance in both L. maculans setups: pretreatment (Fig. 3b) and co-inoculation (Fig. 3b). This suggests that the rapidity of pathogen growth is a crucial factor. In contrast to Pst DC3000, which strongly damaged the inoculated leaves within three days, almost no multiplication of L. maculans occurred during the same period25. Thus, it appears that the slow growth of L. maculans enabled B. napus to establish the SA pathway, which was induced within 24 hours of cytoskeletal drug treatment (Fig. 3a). Overall then, while it is true that plant resistance to pathogens is decreased by a disrupted actin cytoskeleton, our results show that, given sufficient time, plants are able to trigger SA-based defence mechanisms to overcome such threats. This could be due to SA antimicrobial activity, accompanied by the SA-induced production of antimicrobial compounds. These powerful SA properties have been nicely demonstrated in relationship to so-called age-related resistance26–28. Our study shows that SA pathway, specifically induced by actin depolymerization, is more powerful despite the missing actin dynamics.

Up to date, some other works suggest the possible positive effect of depolymerization of actin cytoskeleton on plant immunity. Kobayashi and Kobayashi16 showed that treatment with cytochalins induce NtPR1 transcription in tobacco. Additionally, cytochalasin E primed tobacco cells to induce HR-like cell death in presence of Erysiphe cichoracearum. We can speculate that it could lead to higher resistance against this biotrophic pathogen but it was not explicitly tested16. We confirmed the induction of AtPR-1 gene upon treatment with cytoskeletal depolymerizing drugs in A. thaliana17,29. Recently it was shown that overexpression of AtPRF3, which leads to depolymerization of actin filaments, increased ROS production upon flg22 treatment30. However to our best knowledge, we herein provide the first direct evidence that disruption of the actin cytoskeleton can actually lead to increased plant resistance to pathogens, and that SA is crucial to this process. We strongly believe that our work opens a new and important direction for further research. Is the influence of the actin cytoskeleton on vesicle trafficking involved in SA biosynthesis? For example, when PRRs (pattern recognising receptors) on the plasma membrane recognize MAMPs, it triggers PRRs endocytosis which, in turn, might activate the SA pathway31,32. A well characterised example is the internalization of FLS2, which is dependent on the actin-myosin complex33. Thus, could an imbalance in PRRs result in constitutively activated immunity and, thereby, induce SA biosynthesis? A hint in support of such a hypothesis is provided by a double mutant with impaired phosphatidylinositol-4-kinase β1 and β2 (pi4kβ1β2), which has been shown to alter vesicle trafficking and constitutively increase SA concentration34,35. It is also possible that plants have evolved a system for detecting actin cytoskeleton disruption and that the activation of such a system triggers SA-specific immune responses. However, as yet, we are not able to determine if chemically-depolymerised actin is really the triggering event for immune signalling or whether a pleiotrophic event, such as endoplasmic reticulum stress, results in SA induction. For this reason, further research should be focused on deciphering the specific mechanism by which actin depolymerization triggers SA biosynthesis and the ensuing increased plant resistance to pathogens.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

For the A. thaliana experiments, the following genotypes were used: Columbia-0 (WT); sid2-3 (SALK_042603)24; nahG23 and pUBC::Lifeact-GFP36. A. thaliana seedlings were grown either in liquid MS medium or on solid MS/2 medium. Per litre, the liquid MS medium contained the following: 4.41 g Murashige and Skoog medium including vitamins (Duchefa, Netherlands), 5 g sucrose, 5 g MES monohydrate (Duchefa, Netherlands). Per litre, the solid MS/2 medium contained 2.2 g Murashige and Skoog medium (Duchefa, Netherlands) with 10 g sucrose and 8 g Plant agar (Duchefa, Netherlands). Both media were adjusted to pH 5.7 using 1 M KOH. For cultivation in the liquid, surface-sterilized seeds were sown in 24-well plates containing 400 μL of liquid MS medium per well. The plants were cultivated for 10 days under a short-day photoperiod (10 h/14 h light/dark regime) at 100–130 μE m−2 s−1 and 22 C. On the 7th day, the medium in the wells was exchanged for a fresh one. For cultivation on the solid MS/2 medium, seedlings were grown in Petri dishes for 12 days under a long-day photoperiod (16 h/8 h light/dark regime) at 100–130 μE m−2 s−1 and 22 °C. For A. thaliana plants grown for 4 weeks in soil, surface-sterilized seeds were sown in Jiffy 7 peat pellets and the plants cultivated under a short-day photoperiod (10 h/14 h light/dark regime) at 100–130 μE m−2 s−1, 22 °C and 70% relative humidity. They were watered with fertilizer-free distilled water as necessary

For the B. napus experiments, plants of the Eurol cultivar were grown hydroponically in perlite in Steiner’s nutrient solution (Steiner, 1984) under a 14 h/10 h light/dark regime (25 °C/22 °C) at 150 μE m–2 s–1 and 30–50% relative humidity. True leaves were removed from 14-day-old plantlets to avoid cotyledon senescence.

Treatment with chemical compounds

As actin depolymerizing drugs, latrunculin B (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and cytochalasin E (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were used. Latrunculin B and cytochalasin E were both dissolved in DMSO; the concentration of the stock solutions were 2 mM and 4 mM, respectively.

For the Pst DC3000 resistance assay, the seedlings grown in 24-well plates were treated by replacing the pure liquid MS medium in the plate wells with medium containing 200 nM latrunculin B or 0.01% DMSO control. The seedlings cultivated on the solid medium were treated 24 h by flooding with 10 mL of MS/2 medium containing 200 nM latrunculin B or 0.01% DMSO control. Fully-developed leaves from four-week-old A. thaliana grown in soil were infiltrated either with 200 nM or 1 µM latrunculin B (0.01% or 0.05% DMSO as respective controls) or with 1 µM or 10 µM cytochalasin E (0.025% or 0.25% DMSO as respective controls) 24 h before Pst DC3000 infection using a needleless syringe.

For the transcriptomic assay, the seedlings of A. thaliana grown in 24-well plates were treated 24 h with 200 nM latrunculin B (0.01% DMSO control) or 10 µM cytochalasin E (0.25% DMSO control). Four-week old A. thaliana were infiltrated with 200 nM (0.01% DMSO) or 1 µM latrunculin B (0.05% DMSO) for 24 h. The 10-day-old cotyledons of B. napus were infiltrated either with 1 µM or 10 µM latrunculin B or with 10 µM cytochalasin E (in all cases with corresponding DMSO controls) using a needleless syringe. For infection assay 3 days before infection with L. maculans, for transcriptomic assay 24 and 72 h before harvesting tissue.

Inoculation of A. thaliana seedlings with Pst DC3000

After the A. thaliana seedlings had been cultivated in 24-well plates in the liquid MS medium for 10 days, the cultivation medium was exchanged for one containing latrunculin B or cytochalasin E, and incubated for 24 h. On day 11, the medium was replaced with a bacterial suspension of Pst DC3000 in 10 mM MgCl2 (OD600 = 0.01). The seedlings were incubated in this bacterial suspension for 1 min. After incubation, the suspension was replaced with the liquid MS medium. On day 12, the seedlings were harvested, each sample taken containing all of the seedlings from three wells. The seedlings were then homogenized in tubes with 1 g of 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). The resulting homogenate was serially diluted and pipetted onto King B plates. The colonies were counted after 1–2 days of incubation at 28 °C.

The seedlings cultivated on solid medium were flooded with 200 nM latrunculin B solution in water on day 13. Control plants were treated with a corresponding solution of DMSO. On day 14, the solutions were replaced with a suspension of overnight culture of Pst DC3000 (OD600 = 0.01) containing 0.025% Silwet. Samples were harvested at 0, 1 and 2 dpi, with each sample containing the plants from five plates. The seedlings were homogenized in tubes with 1 g of 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). The resulting homogenate was serially diluted and pipetted onto LB plates containing rifampicin. The colonies were counted after 1–2 days of incubation at 28 °C.

Inoculation of four-week-old A. thaliana with Pst DC3000

Pst DC3000 was grown overnight on King B agar plates at 28 °C, resuspended in 10 mM MgCl2, and diluted to an OD600 of 0.001. Using a needleless syringe, the bacterial suspension was infiltrated into three fully-developed leaves from one plant. After 3 days, the infected tissue was collected as cut leaf discs (one disc per leaf, 0.6-cm diameter); three leaf discs from one plant represent one sample. The discs were homogenized in tubes with 1 g of 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). The resulting homogenate was serially diluted and pipetted onto King B plates. The colonies were counted after 1–2 days of incubation at 28 °C.

Inoculation of B. napus with L. maculans

L. maculans isolate v23.1.325,37 was used to inoculate B. napus. After harvesting, conidia obtained according to Šašek et al.25 were washed once with distilled water, diluted to 108 spores/ml, and stored at –20 °C for up to 6 months. The cotyledons of 14-day-old plants were infiltrated by conidial suspension (105 conidia/ml), with at least 12 plants being used for each inoculation. The leaves were assessed for lesions 10 days after inoculation. The leaf area and the lesion areas therein were measured by image analysis using APS Assess 2.0 software (American Phytopathological Society, USA). The relative lesion area was then calculated as the ratio of lesion area to whole leaf area. For the microscopy studies, the cotyledons infected with GFP-tagged v23.1.3 isolate38 were observed at 10 dpi using a Leica DM5000 B microscope.

Gene expression analysis

The whole seedlings from three independent wells were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. The tissue was homogenized in tubes with 1 g of 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). Total RNA was isolated using a Spectrum Plant Total RNA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and treated with a DNA-free kit (Ambion, USA). Subsequently, 1 μg of RNA was converted into cDNA with M-MLV RNase H− Point Mutant reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., USA) and an anchored oligo dT21 primer (Metabion, Germany). Gene expression was quantified by q-PCR using a LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master kit and LightCycler 480 (Roche, Switzerland). The PCR conditions were 95 °C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. Melting curve analysis was then conducted. Relative expression was normalized to the housekeeping genes AtSAND and BnTIP41. Primers were designed using PerlPrimer v1.1.2139. A list of the analysed genes and primers is available in Table S2.

Phytohormonal analysis

Hormone analysis was carried out on four samples, each of which contained all seedlings from six of the 24 wells or from the four-week-old A. thaliana three leaf discs from every single plant were sampled, three individual plants were sampled as one sample. Plant hormone levels were determined as described by40. Briefly, samples were homogenized in tubes with 1.3 mm silica beads using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, USA). The samples were then extracted with a methanol/H2O/formic acid (15:4:1, v:v:v) mixture, which was supplemented with stable isotope-labeled phytohormone internal standards (10 pmol per sample) in order to check recovery during purification and validate the quantification. The clarified supernatants were subjected to solid phase extraction using Oasis MCX cartridges (Waters Co., USA). The eluates were evaporated to dryness and the generated solids dissolved in 30 μl of 15% (v/v) acetonitrile in water. Quantification was performed on an Ultimate 3000 high-performance liquid chromatograph (Dionex, USA) coupled to a 3200 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, USA) as described by41. Metabolite levels were expressed in pmol/g fresh weight (FW).

Confocal microscopy of actin filaments

For in vivo microscopy, a Zeiss LSM 880 inverted confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Germany) was used with either a 40× C-Apochromat objective (NA = 1.2 W) or a 20x Plan-Apochromat objective (NA = 0.8). GFP fluorescence (excitation 488 nm, emission 489–540 nm) was acquired in z-stacks (20–25 µm thickness). The maximum intensity projections obtained from the z-stacks were created using Zeiss ZEN Black software. Actin filaments density analysis was calculated by Fiji software (https://fiji.sc/)42 as the percent occupancy of GFP signal in each Maximum intensity projection. Image threshold was set to include all actin filaments and area fraction was measured. We analysed 7–11 cutouts from 6–7 plants for each variant. Representative images were selected from photos from at least 6 independent plants.

Growth of Pst DC3000 and L. maculans in vitro in presence of latrunculin B or cytochalasin E

Pst DC3000 grew overnight on solid LB medium containing rifampicin. From this, a fresh bacterial suspension was prepared (OD600 = 0.01) in liquid LB or liquid MS medium. To this suspension, latrunculin B (200 nM or 1 µM) or DMSO (0.05% or 0.01%) was added. The OD600 was measured 6 and 24 h after suspension preparation. Four independent samples were prepared for each type of treatment.

Conidia of the GFP-tagged v23.1.3 isolate of L. maculans38 were grown in vitro in Gamborg B5 medium (Duchefa, Netherlands) supplemented with 0.3% (w/v) sucrose and 10 mM MES monohydrate, and adjusted to pH 6.8. This medium contained latrunculin B (1, 10 µM), cytochalasin E (1, 10 µM) or DMSO control (0.5%), and had a final concentration of 2500 conidia per well. The plates (black 96-well plate, Nunc R), covered with lids and sealed with Parafilm®, were incubated in darkness at 26 °C. On day 4, fluorescence was measured using a Tecan F200 fluorescence reader (Tecan, Switzerland) equipped with a 485/20 nm excitation filter and 535/25 nm emission filter. Eight wells were measured for each treatment.

Trypan blue staining

Detached leaves were immersed to the staining solution (10 mL lactic acid (85%, w:w), 10 mL phenol, 10 mL glycerol, 10 mL dH20, 40 mg trypan blue (final concentration 10 mg.mL−1) for 30 min due to Fernández-Bautista et al.43. Solution was then replaced by ethanol 3 times until leaves were fully decolored from chlorophyll. Leaves were rehydrated by replacing solution with the decreasing ethanol solutions (70%, 50%, 30%, v:v) and kept in water for the microscopy purposes.

Statistical analyses

All experiments were repeated at least three times, except Fig. 3B where we put together data from 3–7 biological repetitions. All statistical analyses were performed with Microsoft Excel 2013. The P values were calculated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA followed with Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) p < 0,01 using software Statistica® v.11 or SigmaPlot11®.

Supplementary information

Supplementary info (1.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Kenichi Tsuda from MPIPZ Cologne for providing the strain of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, prof. Silke Robatzek from LMU Munich for her advices about the text and to Andrea Kung Wai for help with English editing. This work was supported by Czech Science Foundation grant no. 17-05151S and GAUK no. 992416. IEB Imaging Facility is supported by OPPK CZ.2.16/3.1.00/21519 and MEYS LM2015062 from (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000738) were supported: Hana Leontovyčová, Tetiana Kalachova, Romana Pospíchalová, Petre I. Dobrev, Burketová. From Charles University in Prague (project n. SVV260427/2019) was supported Hana Leontovyčová. The pUBC::Lifeact-GFP and 35S::GFP-FABD2 seeds were kindly provided by Dr. Denisa Oulehlová from Žárský laboratory at IEB ASCR. The image of watches in Figure 4 was downloaded for free from https://pixabay.com/.

Author Contributions

H.L., L.T., T.K., M.J. designed the experiments; H.L., L.T., T.K., L.L., R.P., P.I.D., K.M., M.J. performed experiments; H.L., L.T., T.K., L.B., O.V., M.J. analysed the data; H.L., M.J. wrote the manuscript. All the authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-46465-5.

References

  • 1.Day B, Henty JL, Porter KJ, Staiger CJ. The pathogen-actin connection: a platform for defense signaling in plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2011;49:483–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-072910-095426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Li, P. & Day, B. Battlefield Cytoskeleton: Turning the Tide on Plant Immunity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, MPMI07180195FI, 10.1094/MPMI-07-18-0195-FI (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Hardham AR, Jones DA, Takemoto D. Cytoskeleton and cell wall function in penetration resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10:342–348. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Henty-Ridilla JL, Li J, Day B, Staiger CJ. ACTIN DEPOLYMERIZING FACTOR4 regulates actin dynamics during innate immune signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:340–352. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.122499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Henty-Ridilla JL, et al. The plant actin cytoskeleton responds to signals from microbe-associated molecular patterns. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003290. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jelenska J, Kang Y, Greenberg JT. Plant pathogenic bacteria target the actin microfilament network involved in the trafficking of disease defense components. Bioarchitecture. 2014;4:149–153. doi: 10.4161/19490992.2014.980662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang Y, et al. HopW1 from Pseudomonas syringae disrupts the actin cytoskeleton to promote virulence in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004232. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tian M, et al. Arabidopsis actin-depolymerizing factor AtADF4 mediates defense signal transduction triggered by the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPphB. Plant Physiol. 2009;150:815–824. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Porter K, Shimono M, Tian M, Day B. Arabidopsis Actin-Depolymerizing Factor-4 links pathogen perception, defense activation and transcription to cytoskeletal dynamics. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1003006. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Inada N, Higaki T, Hasezawa S. Nuclear Function of Subclass I Actin-Depolymerizing Factor Contributes to Susceptibility in Arabidopsis to an Adapted Powdery Mildew Fungus. Plant Physiol. 2016;170:1420–1434. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shimono M, et al. The Pseudomonas syringae Type III Effector HopG1 Induces Actin Remodeling to Promote Symptom Development and Susceptibility during Infection. Plant Physiol. 2016;171:2239–2255. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shimada C, et al. Nonhost resistance in Arabidopsis-Colletotrichum interactions acts at the cell periphery and requires actin filament function. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2006;19:270–279. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-19-0270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miklis M, et al. Barley MLO modulates actin-dependent and actin-independent antifungal defense pathways at the cell periphery. Plant Physiol. 2007;144:1132–1143. doi: 10.1104/pp.107.098897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kobayashi Y, Yamada M, Kobayashi I, Kunoh H. Actin microfilaments are required for the expression of nonhost resistance in higher plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997;38:725–733. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yun BW, et al. Loss of actin cytoskeletal function and EDS1 activity, in combination, severely compromises non-host resistance in Arabidopsis against wheat powdery mildew. Plant J. 2003;34:768–777. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kobayashi YKI. Depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton inducesdefense responses in tobacco plants. Journal of General Plant Pathology. 2007;73:360–364. doi: 10.1007/s10327-007-0029-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Matouskova J, et al. Changes in actin dynamics are involved in salicylic acid signaling pathway. Plant Sci. 2014;223:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Dempsey DA, Vlot AC, Wildermuth MC, Klessig DF. Salicylic Acid biosynthesis and metabolism. Arabidopsis Book. 2011;9:e0156. doi: 10.1199/tab.0156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vlot AC, Dempsey DA, Klessig DF. Salicylic Acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2009;47:177–206. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.050908.135202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wildermuth MC, Dewdney J, Wu G, Ausubel FM. Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature. 2001;414:562–565. doi: 10.1038/35107108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ishiga Y, Ishiga T, Uppalapati SR, Mysore KS. Arabidopsis seedling flood-inoculation technique: a rapid and reliable assay for studying plant-bacterial interactions. Plant Methods. 2011;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-7-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Katagiri F, Thilmony R, He SY. The Arabidopsis thaliana-pseudomonas syringae interaction. Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1:e0039. doi: 10.1199/tab.0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Delaney TP, et al. A central role of salicylic Acid in plant disease resistance. Science. 1994;266:1247–1250. doi: 10.1126/science.266.5188.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nawrath C, Metraux JP. Salicylic acid induction-deficient mutants of Arabidopsis express PR-2 and PR-5 and accumulate high levels of camalexin after pathogen inoculation. Plant Cell. 1999;11:1393–1404. doi: 10.1105/tpc.11.8.1393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sasek V, et al. Recognition of avirulence gene AvrLm1 from hemibiotrophic ascomycete Leptosphaeria maculans triggers salicylic acid and ethylene signaling in Brassica napus. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2012;25:1238–1250. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-12-0033-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cameron RK, Zaton K. Intercellular salicylic acid accumulation is important for age-related resistance in Arabidopsis to Pseudomonas syringae. Physiol. Mol Plant P. 2004;65:197–209. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2005.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kus JV, Zaton K, Sarkar R, Cameron RK. Age-related resistance in Arabidopsis is a developmentally regulated defense response to Pseudomonas syringae. Plant Cell. 2002;14:479–490. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wilson DC, Kempthorne CJ, Carella P, Liscombe DK, Cameron RK. Age-Related Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana Involves the MADS-Domain Transcription Factor SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE and Direct Action of Salicylic Acid on Pseudomonas syringae. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017;30:919–929. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-17-0172-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Janda M, Matouskova J, Burketova L, Valentova O. Interconnection between actin cytoskeleton and plant defense signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2014;9:e976486. doi: 10.4161/15592324.2014.976486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun H, et al. Profilin Negatively Regulates Formin-Mediated Actin Assembly to Modulate PAMP-Triggered Plant Immunity. Curr Biol. 2018;28:1882–1895 e1887. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tsuda K, Glazebrook J, Katagiri F. The interplay between MAMP and SA signaling. Plant Signal Behav. 2008;3:359–361. doi: 10.4161/psb.3.6.5702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsuda K, Sato M, Glazebrook J, Cohen JD, Katagiri F. Interplay between MAMP-triggered and SA-mediated defense responses. Plant J. 2008;53:763–775. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Beck M, Zhou J, Faulkner C, MacLean D, Robatzek S. Spatio-temporal cellular dynamics of the Arabidopsis flagellin receptor reveal activation status-dependent endosomal sorting. Plant Cell. 2012;24:4205–4219. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Preuss ML, et al. A role for the RabA4b effector protein PI-4Kbeta1 in polarized expansion of root hair cells in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Cell Biol. 2006;172:991–998. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200508116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sasek V, et al. Constitutive salicylic acid accumulation in pi4kIIIbeta1beta2 Arabidopsis plants stunts rosette but not root growth. New Phytol. 2014;203:805–816. doi: 10.1111/nph.12822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cvrckova F, Oulehlova D. A new kymogram-based method reveals unexpected effects of marker protein expression and spatial anisotropy of cytoskeletal dynamics in plant cell cortex. Plant Methods. 2017;13:19. doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0171-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rouxel T, et al. Effector diversification within compartments of the Leptosphaeria maculans genome affected by Repeat-Induced Point mutations. Nat Commun. 2011;2:202. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Trda L, et al. Cytokinin Metabolism of Pathogenic Fungus Leptosphaeria maculans Involves Isopentenyltransferase, Adenosine Kinase and Cytokinin Oxidase/Dehydrogenase. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1374. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Marshall OJ. PerlPrimer: cross-platform, graphical primer design for standard, bisulphite and real-time PCR. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:2471–2472. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dobrev PI, Kaminek M. Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr A. 2002;950:21–29. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00024-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Dobrev PI, Hoyerova K, Petrasek J. Analytical Determination of Auxins and Cytokinins. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1569:31–39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6831-2_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fernández-Bautista, N., Domínguez-Núñez, J. A., Moreno, M. M. C. & Berrocal-Lobo, L. Plant Tissue Trypan Blue Staining During Phytopathogen Infection. BioProtocol6, 10.21769/BioProtoc.2078 (2016).

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary info (1.1MB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES