Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Liver Int. 2019 Feb 24;39(8):1400–1407. doi: 10.1111/liv.14043

Table 3.

Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses of factors associated with DAA-based therapy uptake among recent PWID with chronic HCV infection (n=611), Vancouver, Canada (April 2015 – November 2017)

Characteristic Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Age (per year older) 1.05 (1.02 – 1.07) 1.02 (0.99 – 1.05)
Male gender (yes vs. no) 1.56 (0.95 – 2.64) 1.38 (0.79 – 2.44)
White race (yes vs. no) 1.73 (1.06 – 2.86) 1.73 (1.02 – 3.00)
HIV-positive (yes vs. no) 3.18 (1.95 – 5.97) 2.65 (1.57 – 4.57)
≥ Daily heroin injection (yes vs. no)* 0.52 (0.29 – 0.88) 0.71 (0.38 – 1.27)
≥ Daily cocaine injection (yes vs. no)* 0.80 (0.27 – 1.92)
≥ Daily crack use (yes vs. no)* 0.79 (0.32 – 1.70)
≥ Daily opioid analgesic use (yes vs. no)* 1.14 (0.26 – 3.48)
Syringe sharing (yes vs. no)* 1.14 (0.26 – 3.48)
High-risk drinking (yes vs. no)* 0.57 (0.23 – 1.20)
In addiction care (reference: none)*
OAT 2.01 (1.15 – 3.67) 2.00 (1.11 – 3.78)
Other treatment modalities 1.49 (0.55 – 3.65) 1.44 (0.51 – 3.72)
Ever received IFN-based therapy for HCV infection 0.52 (0.12 – 1.49)
In HCV-related care (yes vs. no)* 2.12 (1.32 – 3.45) 1.44 (0.86 – 2.43)
Homelessness (yes vs. no)* 0.37 (0.15 – 0.78) 0.74 (0.28 – 1.69)
Residency in the Downtown Eastside (yes vs. no)* 0.63 (0.39 – 1.05) 0.76 (0.45 – 1.31)
Employment (yes vs. no)* 1.43 (0.80 – 2.47)
Prohibited income generation (yes vs. no)* 0.54 (0.33 – 0.87) 0.78 (0.46 – 1.31)
Incarceration (yes vs. no)* 0.29 (0.05 – 0.96) 0.50 (0.08 – 1.86)

DAA, direct-acting antiviral; OAT, opioid agonist therapy.

*

Refers to the 6-month period prior to the interview

p<0.10 and included in the multivariable model

p<0.05