Table 1.
Differentially expressed TDF description | Highest homology | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class | TDF | Size (bp) | Genotype and treatment | Development stage | Accession no. | E value | Database | Description |
1 | SN20 | 382 | Récital inoc. | seedling | AJ318884 | 2,0E‐44 | Genbank | Triticum durum xip‐II gene coding a xylanase inhibitor protein |
TC271383 | 9,6E‐26 | TIGR | Chitinase II (Q8W428) | |||||
SN33 | 374 | 2141‐4 inoc. | 2‐node | TC268609 | 1,9E‐71 | TIGR | Beclin1‐like protein Q94C41 | |
SN53 | 546 | 2083R inoc. | tillering | NP_172965 | 2,0E‐14 | Nrprot | hydroxyprolin‐rich glycoprotein | |
SN55 | 277 | 2178R inoc. | tillering | DQ386610 | 9,0E‐32 | Genbank | Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare protein kinase | |
SN60 | 341 | CR inoc. | tillering | TC274868 | 1,1E‐03 | TIGR | 67% homologous to a disease resistance protein (Q9FWC5) | |
SN81 | 400 | 2171‐5 inoc. | 2‐node | TC266739 | 8,3E‐25 | TIGR | 83% similar to the putative calmodulin‐binding protein similar to ER66 (Q8RV24) | |
2 | SN18 | 501 | CR inoc. | tillering | AF459085 | 3,0E‐07 | Genbank | Hordeum vulgare Snf2P gene |
TC247787 | 2,7E‐08 | TIGR | 86% similar to an uncharacterized GPI‐anchored protein At5g19230 precursor (Q8GUL8) | |||||
SN30 | 392 | 2141‐4 mock‐inoc. | tillering | TC273628 | 1,1E‐17 | TIGR | 76% similar to a RNA‐binding protein‐like (Q5VMK2) | |
SN42 | 440 | 2178R inoc. | tillering | TC249344 | 1.4e‐56 | TIGR | 80% similar to a putative SCARECROW gene regulator‐like (Q8S5N0) | |
TC249346 | 3.8e‐49 | TIGR | 71% similar a chitin‐inducible gibberellin‐responsive protein (Q8GVE1) | |||||
SN56 | 675 | 2182R inoc. | tillering | TC251858 | 3,4E‐137 | TIGR | 83% similar to a putative eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4G (Q69S49) | |
SN64 | 428 | 2083R inoc. | tillering | Q94LS3 | 2E‐35 | UniProtKB TrEMBL | Putative helicase | |
3 | SN15 | 346 | 2182R inoc. | seedling | TC232238 | 1,2E‐17 | TIGR | 95% homologous to an Enolase (Q42971) |
SN35 | 479 | CR inoc. | seedling | AP008982 | 0 | Genbank | Triticum aestivum NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (nad2 ) gene | |
SN41 | 479 | 2178R inoc. | seedling | TC242910 | 3,5E‐05 | TIGR | 81% similar to a PPi‐dependent phosphofructo‐ 1‐kinase (Q24812) | |
4 | SN10 | 351 | 2083R inoc. | seedling | TC255554 | 2,0E‐51 | TIGR | 73% homologous to a polysaccharide deacetylase domain protein (Q74GK0) |
SN11 | 528 | 2083R inoc. | seedling | TC258298 | 6,7E‐41 | TIGR | similar to an unknown protein from Oryza sativa (BAD01375) | |
SN19 | 448 | 2141‐2 inoc. | tillering | BE58615 | 3,2E‐239 | Gramene | Wheat Fusarium graminearum‐infected spike cDNA library Triticum aestivum cDNA clone | |
SN31 | 328 | 2178R inoc. | 2‐node | CA746363 | 2,0E‐130 | Gramene | Riband wheat leaves infected with Septoria tritici, 2 dpi, subtracted w/comparable uninfected leaves | |
SN47 | 526 | 2182R inoc. | seedling | CK194708 | 2,2E‐20 | Gramene | Functional Genomics of Abiotic Stress In Wheat | |
SN48 | 174 | Récital inoc. | seedling | TC272466 | 7,6E‐01 | TIGR | 80% similar to ubiquitine‐conjugative E2 putative | |
SN57 | 283 | 2178R inoc. | tillering | BE401099 | 1,5E‐25 | Gramene | Wheat Powdery Mildew Resistant Library Triticum aestivum | |
SN66 | 361 | 2178R inoc. | tillering | TC245138 | 3,6E‐20 | TIGR | 81% similar to a hypothetical protein (Q8S7B5) | |
SN67 | 496 | 2178R inoc. | tillering | TC242459 | 4,1E‐29 | TIGR | 83% similar to an unknown protein from Oryza sativa (BAD28426) | |
SN75 | 368 | Récital inoc. | 2‐node | CA735573 | 2,1E‐14 | Gramene | Wheat, Polk cultivar (resistant), infected with Septoria tritici strain A 24 h after infection | |
SN76 | 475 | Récital inoc. | 2‐node | AJ716858 | 5,7E‐83 | Gramene | cDNA of durum wheat etiolated seedling at day 20 | |
SN82 | 317 | Récital inoc. | seedling | CA697102 | 3,0E‐36 | Gramene | Triticum aestivum seedlings 4 h after treatment with 6‐iodo‐3‐propyl‐2‐propyloxy‐4(3H)‐quinazolinone | |
SN85 | 317 | 2141‐2 inoc. | seedling | TC256592 | 7,4E‐04 | TIGR | 80% similar to a Proline‐rich protein (Q01979) |
The genotype, treatment (inoc = inoculated and mock‐inoc = mock‐inoculated) and development stage at which the band was detected are also indicated. TDFs are classified into four classes: (1) those involved in resistance/defence responses, (2) those encoding transcription or translation regulators, (3) those involved in primary metabolism and (4) those with unknown function.