Skip to main content
. 2008 Jul 9;9(5):687–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00494.x

Table 1.

Effect of transient overexpression and TIGS of Prx genes on basal resistance of barley and wheat.

Construct* Relative SI (% of empty vector control)
Overexpression TIGS
Barley G.Pr. Wheat Barley G.Pr. Barley Ingrid
pGY1_HvPrx08 70 ± 11 n.a.
(OEx HvPrx08) (P = 0.0391)
pIPKTA9_HvPrx40 83 ± 4 45 ± 3
(OEx HvPrx40) (P = 0.0008) (P < 0.0001)
pWIR3§ 54 ± 4 27 ± 2
(OEx TaPrx103) (P < 0.0001) (P < 0.0001)
pHvPrx07hairpin 116 ± 56 124 ± 45
(TIGS HvPrx07) (P = 0.7872) (P = 0.5527)
pIPKTA30N_HvPrx40 184 ± 28 112 ± 10
(TIGS HvPrx40) (P = 0.0105) (P = 0.2547)
pIPKTA34** 14 ± 4 11 ± 2
(TIGS HvMlo) (P = 0.0001) (P < 0.0001)
*

All constructs contain the CamV 35S promoter and terminator. See Fig. 3.

SI, susceptibility index = number of GUS‐positive cells containing at least one haustorium/total number of GUS‐positive cells.

G.Pr, barley cv. Golden Promise.

§

Described by Schweizer et al. (1999).

Described by Christensen et al. (2004).

**

Described by Douchkov et al. (2005).