Table 1.

Quantitative trait loci (QTLs) detected for each scoring date.

Scoring date	QTL	MR*		KW†				CIM‡
		Closest marker	P value	Closest marker	K §	Df¶	P value	Closest marker	LOD**	R 2 ††	‡‡
GP1	PPV‐1H.a	ssrPaCITA05	3.5 × 10−3
GP2	PPV‐1H.a			SSR03AG51	11.67	1	6.4 × 10−4
GP2	PPV‐1H.b	Cd195ssr	4 × 10−4	N86B11ssr3	11.75	1	6.1 × 10−4
GP2	PPV‐1H.c			SSR01iso4G	14.44	1	1.5 × 10−4	SSR01iso4G	2.84	7.15	26.90
GP3	PPV‐1H.a			pchcms4	32.83	1	1.0 × 10−8	pchcms4	3.84	7.60	40.81
GP3	PPV‐1H.b	Cd195ssr	< 10−4	N86B11ssr3	20.83	1	5.0 × 10−6	N86B11ssr3	10.33	28.14
GP3	PPV‐1H.c			UDAp‐414	23.61	1	1.2 × 10−6	UDAp‐414	3.76	8.21
GP3	PPV‐3H.a							SSR02iso4G	3.86	10.94
GP4	PPV‐1H.a	Cd195ssr	< 10−4	pchcms4	47.02	1	7.0 × 10−2	pchcms4	7.61	14.44	48.48
GP4	PPV‐1H.b			N86B11ssr3	37.21	1	1.1 × 10−9	N86B11ssr3	15.17	39.44
GP4	PPV‐1H.c			SSR01iso4G	23.29	1	1.4 × 10−6	SSR01iso4G	2.81	4.94
GP5	PPV‐1H.a	pchcms4	< 10−4	pchcms4	36.93	1	1.2 × 10−9	pchcms4	5.25	12.59	41.44
GP5	PPV‐1H.b			N86B11ssr3	24.58	1	7.1 × 10−7	ssrPaCITA05	10.79	33.26
GP5	PPV‐1H.c			UDAp‐414	13.47	1	2.4 × 10−4
GP5	PPV‐3H.a	SSR02iso4G	3.4 × 10−3

^* QTL detected in ‘Harlayne’ using QTLCartographer MultiRegress procedure.

^† QTL detected in ‘Harlayne’ using Kruskal–Wallis test.

^‡ QTL detected in ‘Harlayne’ using composite interval mapping.

^§ Kruskal–Wallis test value.

^¶ Degree of freedom.

^** Logarithm of odds score (composite interval mapping).

^†† Individual contribution of the QTL to phenotypic variance.

^‡‡ Total contribution of the detected QTL to phenotypic variance.