Table 3.
Cross name | Population structure | Trait name | N * | Map† | QTL name | LG‡ | LOD§ | R 2 ¶ | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘Polonais’ × ‘Stark Early Orange’ | F1 | NSF1 | 104 | ‘Stark Early Orange’ | PPV1‐1s | 1 | 14.87 | 45.6 | Lambert et al. (2007) |
PPV1‐2s | 1 | 3.52** | 15 | ||||||
PPV3‐1s | 3 | 2.82 | 5.7 | ||||||
‘Polonais’ | PPV3‐1p | 3 | 2.45 | 9.2 | |||||
NSF2 | 84 | ‘Stark Early Orange’ | PPV1‐1s | 1 | 15.74 | 56.2 | |||
PPV1‐2s | 1 | 3.39** | 16.9 | ||||||
PPV3‐1s | 3 | 2.94 | 5.7 | ||||||
‘Polonais’ | PPV3‐1p | 3 | 2.79 | 14.7 | |||||
‘Lito’ × ‘Lito’ | F2 | PPV | 81 | ‘Lito’ | PPV_Lito | 1 | 5.14** | 25.4 | Soriano et al. (2008) |
‘Goldrich’ × ‘Currot’ | F1 | PPV | 81 | ‘Goldrich’ | PPV_Gold | 1 | 6.05** | 36.8 | Soriano et al. (2008) |
‘SD40’ × ‘SD40’ | F2 | Not0405b | 69 | ‘SD40’ (P. davidiana) | PPV‐1.b | 1 | 3.02 | 12 | Marandel et al. (2009) |
Not0905 | 68 | PPV‐1.b | 1 | 5.02 | 18 | ||||
‘LE‐3246’ × ‘Vestar’ | BC1 | PPV04 | 67 | ‘LE‐3246’ | PPV_LE‐3246 | 1 | 4.22†† | 24 | Lalli et al. (2008) |
‘Harlayne’ × ‘Marlén’ | F1 | GP2 | 141 | ‘Harlayne’ | PPV‐1H.c | 1 | 2.84 | 7.2 | Present study |
GP3 | 145 | ‘Harlayne’ | PPV‐1H.a | 1 | 3.84 | 7.6 | |||
PPV‐1H.b | 1 | 10.33 | 28.1 | ||||||
PPV‐1H.c | 1 | 3.76 | 8.2 | ||||||
PPV‐3H.a | 3 | 3.86 | 10.9 | ||||||
GP4 | 145 | ‘Harlayne’ | PPV‐1H.a | 1 | 7.61 | 14.4 | |||
PPV‐1H.b | 1 | 15.17 | 39.4 | ||||||
PPV‐1H.c | 1 | 2.81 | 4.9 | ||||||
GP5 | 140 | ‘Harlayne’ | PPV‐1H.a | 1 | 5.25 | 12.6 | |||
PPV‐1H.b | 1 | 10.79 | 33.3 |
Size of the mapping population used to detect QTL.
Parental map on which QTL was detected.
Linkage group.
Logarithm of odds score (composite interval mapping).
Individual contribution of the QTL to phenotypic variance.
QTL detected by simple interval mapping.
Data analysed in this study to map QTL by composite interval mapping.