Skip to main content
. 2008 Jun 28;9(5):697–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00488.x

Table 1.

Fusarium culmorum disease formation on the floral tissue of various defence signalling mutants and the corresponding wild‐type ecotype Col‐0.

Arabidopsis genotype Tissue type
Flowers New siliques Replication
Mean* SEM P‐value Mean SEM P‐value N M§
Col‐0 (wt) 1.85 0.27 n.a.** 1.90 0.24 n.a. 244 19
npr1 3.21 0.42 0.003 1.90 0.36 n.s.†† 103 6
sid2/eds16 0.98 0.45 n.s. 1.90 0.38 n.s. 112 5
coi1 0.15 0.57 0.006 0.62 0.50 n.s. 43 4
jar1 0.83 0.46 0.039 1.53 0.40 n.s. 77 5
ein2 2.77 0.43 0.045 2.21 0.38 n.s. 89 6
35S:ERF1 2.15 0.51 n.s. 1.56 0.45 n.s. 52 5
eto1 0.74 0.64 n.s. 1.02 0.57 n.s. 28 3
etr1 2.22 0.55 n.s. 2.37 0.48 n.s. 44 4
eds11 3.62 0.48 0.001 2.74 0.41 n.s. 92 5
*

Estimated mean disease values determined using mixed model analysis for flowers and new siliques.

Represents the disease comparison between the Arabidopsis mutant genotype and the wild‐type.

A P‐value < 0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. ‡Total number of plants inoculated per Arabidopsis genotype.

§

Number of experiments in which the Arabidopsis mutant genotype was tested against the wild‐type.

Degrees of freedom for the flowers = 40 and for the new siliques = 34.

**

Not applicable.

††

††Not significant.