Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 12;7(13):e14137. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14137

Table 3.

Calcium‐handing properties of mES‐CM in co‐culture

  mES‐CM Direct Co‐culture
Untreated LPS‐treated IL‐4‐treated
24 h
N, n 3, 33 3, 25 3, 16 3, 29
Amp, F/F 0 1.2 ± 0.1 1.31 ± 0.17* 1.29 ± 0.15 1.48 ± 0.19* , , §
T 50, msec 133.6 ± 59.0 138.0 ± 52.5 225.2 ± 124.8 188.9 ± 105.5
CI Amp, F/F 0 1.9 ± 0.4 1.94 ± 0.58 2.24 ± 0.63 2.45 ± 0.58* ,
CI T50, msec 1817.5 ± 1618.9 1377.6 ± 655.8 1515.7 ± 891.8 1193.9 ± 602.0
72 h
N, n 6, 45 6, 19 6, 31 6, 22
Amp, F/F 0 1.3 ± 0.2 1.63 ± 0.37 1.24 ± 0.15 1.36 ± 0.14 , §
T 50, msec 136.9 ± 91.6 180.1 ± 70.3 129.1 ± 47.6 169 ± 88.7
CI Amp, F/F 0 2.2 ± 0.4 2.36 ± 0.52 2.11 ± 0.46 2.07 ± 0.35
CI T 50, msec 1335.6 ± 762.8 914.1 ± 427.7 1376.4 ± 693.2 1025.4 ± 287.0

Values are mean ± SD. N, independent trials; n, cell number; Amp, paced transient amplitude; T 50, paced transient T 50; CI Amp, caffeine‐induced transient amplitude; CI T 50, caffeine‐induced transient T 50; One‐way ANOVA and Tukey or Kruskal–Wallis and Games‐Howell; *P < 0.05 versus monoculture; P < 0.05 versus untreated; § P < 0.05 versus LPS‐treated.