Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 16;3(4):4231–4241. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b02094

Table 2. Properties of Some Modified PAN and Other Antifouling Ultrafiltration Membranes in the Literature.

modification method or membrane material flux (L/m2·h·bar) and FRR (BSA) rejection FRR change (PAN)a flux ratio (PAN)a refs
coating [polyethyleneimine (PEI) + Cu2+] PAN–PEI–Cu, flux: 63 (at 0.16 MPa) HA: 91%   63/128 (49)
hydrolysisa/poly(AN-co-meth acrylic acid) membrane flux: 28–150 at 1.5 kg/cm2 MWCO: 9–75 kDa from 53 to 91% (28–150)/215 (50)
hydrolysis + reaction (with DETAd+ PFOAe) PAN–PFOA, flux: 89 BSA: 99.5% from 58 to 96%c 90/150 (37)
hydrolysis + reaction (with PEG) PAN–PEG, flux: 40   from 64 to 77% 40/56 (40)
hydrolysis + reaction (with oligodeoxynucleotide) modified PAN, flux: 79 BSA: 93% from 41 to 89% 77/79 (51)
hydrolysis + reaction (with PEI-based zwitterion) Z(PEI)–PAN, flux: 125 BSA: 99% from 78 to 99.8%c 140/160 (52)
hydrolysis + coating (tetraethyl orthosilicate) PAN–SiO2; flux: 58 PEG6000: 90% from 76 to 91% 58/605 (53)
additivef (PAN-g-poly(vinyl alcohol))/PAN (hollow fiber) flux: 140 trypsin: 74% from 75 to 85% 140/41 (54)
coating (sulfonated poly-aniline)/PVDF membrane PVDF/SPANI, flux: 160 BSA: 90% from 65 to 95%g   (55)
additive (PU)/PVDF membrane PU–PVDF (adding 4%), flux: 181 BSA: 90% 90%   (56)
reaction (with ETA)/PAN membrane P70/E12-6h-D, flux: 100 PEG20000: 91% from 28 to 82% 100/260 this study
a

Compared with the nascent PAN membrane.

b

Hydrolysis: NaOH treatment.

c

BSA solution with buffer.

d

EDTA: diethylenetriamine.

e

PFOA: pentadecafluorooctanoic acid.

f

Membrane prepared by the NIPS method using special additive, shown in brace.

g

Membrane was taken out and immersed in the phosphate butter for 10 min and rinsed with pure water for 20 min.