Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 13;3(4):4199–4212. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00157

Table 2. Reaction Condition Optimization for the Reduction of Nitrobenzene to Aniline with Formic Acida.

2.3.

entry catalyst catalyst loading (mol %) solvent temperature (°C) conversion (%)b selectivity (%)b
1   0 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 20.2 2.5
2c UiO-66   2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 28.5 2.8
3 RuCl3 1.0 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 28.2 1.8
4 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 100 >99
5 UiO-66–Ru 0.5 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 100 42.8
6 UiO-66–Ru 0.7 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 150 100 89.6
7 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 110 60.2 54.0
8 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 2-PrOH/H2O (9/1) 130 66.9 75.3
9 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 2-PrOH 150 62.8 39.4
10 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 2-PrOH/H2O (4/1) 150 72.4 34.1
11 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 EtOH 150 91.0 12.7
12 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 MeOH/H2O (4.5/1) 150 90.8 59.8
13 UiO-66–Ru 1.0 toluene 150 84.1 95.0
a

Reaction conditions: nitrobenzene 0.5 mmol, formic acid 2.5 mmol, solvent 3 mL, reaction temperature 150 °C, reaction time 3 h.

b

Conversation and selectivity were determined by GC on the basis of area %.

c

UiO-66 17.0 mg.