Skip to main content
. 2019 May 11;36(7):1401–1412. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01470-5

Table 2.

Influence of 30-min or 60-min equilibration in 0 (control), 0.5, 2.0, or 5.0 mM of AICAR on sperm motion (SCA program analysis) in fresh or frozen-thawed epididymal cat spermatozoa. Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10 cats)

Metrics Fresh Control 0.5 mM AICAR 2.0 mM AICAR 5.0 mM AICAR
VCL (μm/s) Cooled sperm 69.3 ± 5.5 A
  30 min 68.1 ± 13.3A,a 70.9 ± 10.7A,a 66.5 ± 9.4A,a 57.3 ± 17.1B,a
  60 min 60.3 ± 2.9B,b 71.5 ± 2.1A,a 58.1 ± 0.7B,b 49.5 ± 2.3C,b
Cryopreserved sperm
58.2 ± 2.2A,a 65.7 ± 4.4B,a 61.3 ± 9.1A,B,a 48.7 ± 11.2B,a
  30 min 57.4 ± 4.9A,a 64.3 ± 5.1B,a 54.4 ± 8.3A,a 44.1 ± 6.6C,a
  60 min
VAP (μm/s) Cooled sperm 36.1 ± 5.1A
  30 min 39.1 ± 6.5A,a 40.2 ± 6.1A,a 34.3 ± 3.4A,a 32.5 ± 6.7A,a
  60 min 35.9 ± 1.1A,a 34.8 ± 2.8A,a 33.9 ± 1.6A,a 25.2 ± 4.5B,b
Cryopreserved sperm
30.7 ± 7.8A,B,a 32.9 ± 6.2A,a 29.6 ± 4.1A,B,a 27.5 ± 3.8B,a
  30 min 31.1 ± 5.8A,a 29.2 ± 4.5A,a 28.4 ± 6.7A,a 22.6 ± 5.9B,a
  60 min
VSL (μm/s) Cooled sperm 48.3 ± 2.6 A
  30 min 46.3 ± 3.7A,a 47.3 ± 4.0A,a 44.8 ± 2.6A,a 41.2 ± 1.1B,a
  60 min 44.9 ± 3.4A,a 48.1 ± 2.2A,a 38.8 ± 3.1B,b 35.4 ± 3.7B,b
Cryopreserved sperm
  30 min 38.2 ± 2.2A,a 43.9 ± 2.1B,a 39.3 ± 3.6A,B,a 34.8 ± 5.7B,a
  60 min 39.1 ± 3.8A,a 42.9 ± 3.4A,a 34.7 ± 4.4B,a 30.8 ± 6.9B,a
ALH (μm) Cooled sperm 2.3 ± 0.9 A
  30 min 2.5 ± 0.7A,a 2.7 ± 0.7A,a 2.8 ± 0.6A,a 3.1 ± 0.7B,a
  60 min 3.3 ± 0.4B,a 3.3 ± 0.7B,a 2.9 ± 0.5A,a 3.3 ± 0.5B,a
Cryopreserved sperm
2.6 ± 0.3A,a 2.7 ± 0.9A,a 3.1 ± 0.7A,a 3.3 ± 0.4A,a
  30 min 3.5 ± 0.6A,b 3.0 ± 0.8A,a 3.0 ± 0.3A,a 3.7 ± 0.6A,a
  60 min

Fresh sample data were only compared with cooled samples

Within the same row, values with different uppercase letters between treatment groups are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05)

Within a treatment group, values with lowercase letters between incubation times are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05)