Table 2.
Comparison of NuRIM results with reference values from the literature
| Nucleoporin | NuRIM, nm | Kim et al. (5),* nm | Alber et al. (9),† nm | Rout et al. (2),‡ nm |
| Nup133 | 3.4 | −0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup84 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup145C | −0.6 | −1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup85 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup120 | −1.4 | −0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Seh1 | 2.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nic96 | −2.9 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup188 | −0.5 | −0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup192 | −2 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup157 | −0.3 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup170 | 1.5 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup53 | 2.0 | −0.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup59 | −2.8 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Nup57 | −0.1 | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| NDC1 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | |
| Pom152 | −0.31 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Pom34 | 1.9 | 1.1 | 0.0 | |
| Nup116 | −7.3 | −19.6 | −13 | −28 |
| Nup100 | 1.7 | −9.5 | −8 | −32 |
| Nup159 | −8.6 | −16.5 | −13 | −27 |
| Nup42 | −9.5 | −21.9 | −13 | −35 |
| Nup82 | −11.5 | −20.7 | −13 | −52 |
| Gle1 | −7.4 | −17.2 | −11 | −22 |
| Nup1 | 12.8 | 7.2 | 12 | 53 |
| Nup60 | 14.7 | 14.8 | 14 | 41 |
| Mlp1 | 19.7 | 36.2 | ||
| Mlp2 | 17 | 12.9 |
*
Values were sourced from the reference probability density maps using UCSF Chimera software with the “measure center” command (5). Thus, by virtue of averaging across symmetric units, many Nups are close to 0 nm. This facilitates comparison with NuRIM results where such averaging cannot be avoided.
†
Values were sourced from reference supplementary figure 25 in ref. 9. Nups considered “symmetric” were rewritten here as “0.0” nm to facilitate comparison with NuRIM results.
‡
Values were sourced from reference table II in ref. 2. Nups considered symmetric were rewritten here as 0.0 nm to facilitate comparison with NuRIM results.