Table 4.
Frequency distribution of variables used to identify missing decision tree branches
Yes | No | NA | No available data | |
Related PDA | 5 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
Missing | Clear | NA | No available data | |
Pros and Cons logic | 5 | 10 | 4 | 1 |
Yes | Possibly yesa | No | No information available | |
Missing structure 1 | 10 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
Missing structure 2b | 6 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Missing structure 1 OR Missing structure 2c | 12 | 2 | – | – |
Missing structure 1 AND Missing structure 2c | – | – | 7 | 1 |
NA Not applicable
aIndicates lack of discussion about cause which could potentially change the options, either add more or have less
bDoes not add to 20 because each PDA was evaluated by 1 or 2 missing structure variables
cDoes not add to 20 because values are based on contingency tables