Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;40(28):2327–2335. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz304

Table 2.

Incidence rates (IR) and subhazard ratios (sHR) for outcomes in relation to OAC treatment

As treated during follow-upa
As treated at baselineb
Events IR per 100 risk years (95% CI) sHR (95% CI) Events IR per 100 risk years (95% CI) sHR (95% CI)
Composite brain endpoint No OAC 535 0.84 (0.77–0.92) Reference 1279 1.14 (1.08–1.20) Reference
OAC 380 0.72 (0.81–0.92) 0.88 (0.77–1.00) 938 0.86 (0.81–0.92) 0.77 (0.70–0.83)
Dementia No OAC 174 0.27 (0.23–0.31) Reference 288 0.25 (0.22–0.28) Reference
OAC 88 0.16 (0.13–0.20) 0.62 (0.48–0.81) 215 0.19 (0.17–0.22) 0.79 (0.66–0.94)
Ischaemic stroke No OAC 331 0.52 (0.46–0.58) Reference 955 0.84 (0.79–0.90) Reference
OAC 246 0.46 (0.41–0.53) 0.92 (0.78–1.09) 618 0.56 (0.52–0.61) 0.68 (0.61–0.75)
ICH No OAC 63 0.10 (0.08–0.12) Reference 116 0.10 (0.08–0.12) Reference
OAC 60 0.11 (0.09–0.14) 1.19 (0.84–1.70) 148 0.13 (0.11–0.16) 1.35 (1.06–1.72)
Death from any cause No OAC 1461 2.25 (2.14–2.37) Reference 1885 1.63 (1.56–1.70) Reference
OAC 659 1.23 (1.14–1.33) 0.54 (0.50–0.60) 1465 1.32 (1.25–1.39) 0.81 (0.75–0.87)
Falsification endpointc No OAC 2652 4.61 (4.44–4.79) Reference 5084 5.05 (4.92–5.20) Reference
OAC 2381 5.14 (4.94–5.35) 1.14 (1.08–1.20) 4964 5.19 (5.04–5.33) 1.03 (1.00–1.08)
a

Comparison of outcomes for 17 092 patients never exposed to OAC and 20 329 patients who used OAC >80% of time at risk, all within the propensity-score matched cohorts.

b

Comparison of outcomes for patients propensity score matched for the likelihood of OAC treatment at baseline, with 23 746 patients in each group.

c

Composite endpoint consisting of fall accident, pneumonia, newly diagnosed osteoarthritis, newly diagnosed diabetes, and newly diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.