Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 21;9(2):020408. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.020408

Table 5.

Results of meta-regression analyses to identify associations and sources of between-study heterogeneity in syphilis prevalence in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)

Factors

Studies Samples Univariable analyses
Multivariable analysis*
Total N
Total n
OR† (95% CI)
P
P‡ of LR test
Variance explained R2 (%)
AOR† (95% CI)
P
P§ of LR test
Country/subregion:‖
Eastern MENA
Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan
28
10 865
1.00

<0.001
31.52
1.00

<0.001
Egypt, Jordan, Yemen
Egypt, Jordan, Yemen
4
881
0.89 (0.15-5.10)
0.893


0.66 (0.13-3.28)
0.609

North Africa
Algeria, Morocco, Sudan, Tunisia
48
12 394
5.34 (2.45-11.61)
<0.001


5.01 (2.37-10.61)
<0.001

Horn of Africa
Djibouti, Somalia, South Sudan
26
5629
21.63 (8.89-52.69)
<0.001


6.40 (2.45-16.69)
<0.001

Year of data collection

106
29 769
0.88 (0.85-0.91)
<0.001
<0.001
34.61
0.93 (0.88-0.98)
0.005
0.005
Infection type
Current
34
7103
1.00

0.515
0.00




Ever**
50
9968
1.25 (0.52-3.00)
0.622






Unclear
22
12 698
0.69 (0.23-2.04)
0.501





Diagnostic method
RPR/VDRL & TPHA/FTA-ABS/RDT
29
6095
1.00

<0.001
22.44
1.00

0.444

RPR/VDRL
4
488
0.09 (0.01-0.61)
0.013


0.76 (0.15-4.00)
0.746


TPHA
28
1781
2.17 (0.86-5.45)
0.099


1.29 (0.54-3.07)
0.558


RDT
23
8707
0.17 (0.06-0.45)
<0.001


0.46 (0.18-1.18)
0.104


Not specified
22
12 698
0.43 (0.16-1.16)
0.094


0.75 (0.24-2.33)
0.614

STI ascertainment
Biological assay not reported
23
13 066
1.00

0.284
0.15




Biological assay explicitly indicated
83
16 703
1.66 (0.65-4.20)
0.284





Sample size
<100 participants
42
1960
1.00

<0.001
20.02††
1.00



≥100 participants
64
27 809
0.16 (0.08-0.32)
<0.001


1.60 (0.62-4.15)
0.329
0.329
Sampling methodology
Non-probability/unclear sampling
66
12 555
1.00

<0.001
18.73‡‡
1.00



Probability-based sampling
40
17 214
0.16 (0.08-0.34)
<0.001


0.63 (0.25-1.63)
0.339
0.339
Response rate
<60%/unclear
69
18 400
1.00

<0.001
10.23§§
1.00


≥60% 37 11 369 0.25 (0.12-0.54) 0.001 0.73 (0.29-1.84) 0.495 0.495

AOR – adjusted odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, FTA-ABS – fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test, LR – likelihood ratio, OR – odds ratio, P – P-value, RDT – rapid diagnostic test, RPR – rapid plasma regain, STI – sexually transmitted infection TPHA – Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay. VDRL – venereal disease research laboratory

*Adjusted R2 in the multivariable model: 48.46%.

†An increment of 0.1 was added to number of events when generating log odds of syphilis infection. This is because 8 stratified measures had zero events.

‡Factors with P ≤ 0.1 were eligible for inclusion in the multivariable analysis.

§Factors with P < 0.05 in the multivariable model were considered as significant predictors.

‖Countries were grouped based on geography and similarity in prevalence levels.

¶Missing values for year of data collection (only one stratified measure) were imputed using data for year of publication adjusted by the median difference between year of publication and median year of data collection for studies with complete information.

**Ever infection indicates seropositivity using antibody testing.

††The high R2 was investigated and found to be due to confounding with year of data collection. Most studies with sample size ≥100 were conducted in recent years.

‡‡The high R2 was investigated and found to be due to confounding with country and year of data collection. Studies with non-probability sampling were mostly from the Horn of Africa. These studies tended also to be conducted in earlier years.

§§The high R2 was investigated and found to be due to confounding with year of data collection. Most studies with response rate ≥60% were conducted in recent years.