Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 19;9(16):4567–4579. doi: 10.7150/thno.31502

Table 1.

Coefficients of variation (CV, %) for each miRNA and method evaluated.

miRNA PAR INV NOR
N CV (%) N CV (%) N CV (%)
cel-miR-39 10 69.5 10 15.3
hsa-miR-21-5p 10 39.1 10 22.2 10 30.5
hsa-miR-451a 10 35.4 10 24.0 10 24.2
hsa-miR-92a-3p 10 36.6 10 27.4 10 30.8
hsa-miR-22-3p 10 52.7 10 21.9 10 13.9
hsa-miR-1911-5p
hsa-miR-1264
hsa-miR-30c-5p 10 38.7 10 39.1
hsa-miR-34b-3p
Mean CV (%) 40.5 ± 7.0 33.0 ± 20.5 25.6 ± 9.8

NOR had the lowest coefficient of variation, followed by the INV and PAR methods. Only the cases in which the miRNAs were detected in all 10 replicates were considered. Abbreviations: number of replicates analyzed (N), mirVana PARIS Kit from Ambion (PAR), Total Exosome Isolation Reagent from Invitrogen (INV), and Plasma/Serum RNA Purification Kit from Norgen (NOR).