Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;3(11):16377–16385. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01781

Table 3. Comparative Catalytic Performance of the Cu(II)-Fur-APTES/GO Nanocatalyst with Other Previously Reported Catalysts.

entry name of catalyst amount of catalyst time/yield (%) solvent/condition refs
1 Fe3O4@SiO2-imid-PMAn 30 mg 1.5 h/94 EtOH/reflux (57)
2 [bmim]HSO4 100 mg 3 h/85 solvent free/80 °C (58)
3 Fe3+-montmorillonite 85 mg 6 h/94 EtOH/100 °C (14)
4 boric acid 0.5 mol % 20 min/98 solvent free/120 °C (59)
5 Zr(DP)2 10 mol % 24 h/98 EtOH/reflux (60)
6 CuO NPs 7 mg 14 min/89 solvent free/100 °C (61)
7 CaCl2 20 mol % 4 h/85 DMSO/85–90 °C (62)
8 SO42–/ZrO2 15 wt % 8 h/95 EtOH/70 °C (63)
9 p-sulfonic acid calix[4]arene 1.5 mol % 35 min/97 EtOH/80 °C (64)
10 SBSSA 30 mg 10 h/98 EtOH/reflux (65)
11 ZnO–CH3COCl 30 mol % 5 h/86 CH3CN/reflux (66)
12 Cu(II)-Fur-APTES/GO 20 mg 30 min/95 H2O/EtOH (1:1) present work