Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of both experiments. For both experiments, the difference in behavior between congruent and incongruent trials is broken down per stimulation condition. Mean values are reported with their respective standard deviation.

	Accuracy (%)	Response times (ms)
Experiment 1	94.9 ± 2.3	624.3 ± 54
Sham
Congruent	95.9 ± 2.8	604.2 ± 50.6
Incongruent	94.6 ± 2.4	652.3 ± 59.1
6 Hz
Congruent	95.3 ± 2.9	602.2 ± 59.1
Incongruent	93.7 ± 2.7	638.8 ± 61.9
Experiment 2	97.6 ± 2.1	578.1 ± 57
Sham
Congruent	98.2 ± 1.7	583.4 ± 68.6
Incongruent	97.8 ± 1.5	604.5 ± 84.9
6 Hz tACS
Congruent	97.6 ± 2.5	554.9 ± 60.5
Incongruent	96.9 ± 3.4	583.4 ± 68.6
9.7 Hz tACS
Congruent	98.1 ± 1.9	560.3 ± 49.2
Incongruent	97.0 ± 2.3	595.5 ± 69