Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 10;3(10):12985–12998. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01868

Table 2. Optimization of Base and Solvent in the Coupling of 1 and 2a.

graphic file with name ao-2018-01868w_0007.jpg

      3 (yield, %)b
entry base solvent t = 2 h t = 18 h
1 DABCO MTBE 42 54
2 DABCO DCM 25 35
3 DABCO MeOH 27 35
4 DABCO EtOH 26 40
5 DABCO THF 46 72
6 DABCO 1,4-dioxane 40 74
7 DABCO ACN 67 82
8 DABCO DMF 42 62
9 DABCO NMP 26 40
10 DABCO 3 wt % PTS in H2O 33 50
11 DABCO DMSO 91 100
12 none DMSO 0 0
13 NaOAc DMSO 86 100
14 KOH DMSO 50 100
15 K2CO3 DMSO 50 100
16 K3PO4 DMSO 51 100
17 KHCO3 DMSO 26 43
18 Cs2CO3 DMSO 0 0
19 TBAF DMSO 0 0
20 t-BuNH2 DMSO 86 89
21 iPr2NH DMSO 100 100
22 Hunigs’ base DMSO 84 100
23 TMP DMSO 100 100
24 Et2NH DMSO 15 56
25 Et3N DMSO 53 58
26 pyrrolidine DMSO 27 100
27 piperidine DMSO 42 100
28 morpholine DMSO 20 58
29 DBU DMSO 2 10
a

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 2 (0.8 mmol), P2 (0.025 mmol, 5 mol %), base (1.0 mmol), solvent (2.5 mL), rt for 18 h under argon atmosphere.

b

Yield was determined by LC/MS with pyrene as internal standard.