Table 1. Comparison of the Developed Cytosensor with Other Nanomaterial-Based Cytosensors.
| sensor fabricationa | cells | methodb | linear range (cell mL–1) | LODc (cell mL–1) | refs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA–PEI–CNT | Hela | EIS | 2.4 × 102 to 2.4 × 105 | 90 | (46) |
| AuNPs–gelatin | HL-60 | EIS | 1 × 104 to 1 × 107 | 5 × 103 | (47) |
| SiO2@QDs–ConA | HL-60 | ASV | 1 × 103 to 1 × 107 | 1 × 103 | (48) |
| Ru–DNA–AuNPs | Ramons | ECL | 5 × 102 to 1 × 105 | 300 | (49) |
| CNS–APBA | MCF-7 | DPV | 5 × 102 to 1 × 106 | 25 | (50) |
| CNTs@PDA–FA | Hela | EIS | 5 × 102 to 5 × 106 | 500 | (51) |
| MWCNTs | HL-60 | DPV | 2.7 × 102 to 2.7 × 107 | 90 | (52) |
| M-Pd@Au-ConA | MCF-7 | amperometry | 1 × 102 to 1 × 106 | 30 | this work |
a
FA, folate; PEI, polyetherimide; CNTs, carbon nanotubes; AuNPs, gold nanoparticles; QDs, quantum dots; ConA, concanavalin A; CNS, carbon nanospheres; APBA, 3-aminophenylboronic acid; PDA, polydopamine; and Pd@Au, porous core–shell palladium gold nanoparticles.
b
EIS, electrochemical impedance spectra; ASV, anodic stripping voltammetry; ECL, electrochemiluminescence; and DPV, differential pulse voltammetry.
c
LOD, limit of detection.