Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 1;29(8):3605–3616. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy235

Table 2.

Sulcal pattern similarity between TD and CHD groups

Left hemisphere Right hemisphere
TD CHD P-value (t-test) P-value (regression) TD CHD P-value (t-test) P-value (regression)
SI
 Combined features 0.822 (0.023) 0.795 (0.030) 0.006* 0.002* 0.818 (0.014) 0.809 (0.026) 0.175 0.415
 3D position 0.875 (0.021) 0.856 (0.017) 0.005* 0.008* 0.872 (0.019) 0.866 (0.022) 0.407 0.620
 Sulcal basin area 0.918 (0.019) 0.908 (0.045) 0.405 0.083 0.922 (0.017) 0.917 (0.032) 0.576 0.231
 Sulcal depth 0.932 (0.019) 0.923 (0.012) 0.093 0.138 0.930 (0.013) 0.926 (0.016) 0.406 0.562
SI a
 Combined features 0.760 (0.034) 0.741 (0.051) 0.207 0.106 0.771 (0.028) 0.756 (0.047) 0.267 0.241
 3D position 0.894 (0.019) 0.876 (0.019) 0.007* 0.002* 0.900 (0.014) 0.895 (0.015) 0.298 0.386
 Sulcal basin area 0.807 (0.037) 0.797 (0.059) 0.583 0.358 0.820 (0.035) 0.802 (0.058) 0.264 0.173
 Sulcal depth 0.940 (0.016) 0.934 (0.015) 0.200 0.334 0.945 (0.013) 0.933 (0.016) 0.019 0.024
SI b
 Combined features 0.832 (0.023) 0.807 (0.023) 0.003* 0.003* 0.827 (0.015) 0.819 (0.022) 0.236 0.339
 3D position 0.872 (0.022) 0.854 (0.018) 0.009* 0.015 0.867 (0.019) 0.861 (0.022) 0.429 0.608
 Sulcal basin area 0.937 (0.015) 0.929 (0.029) 0.352 0.145 0.940 (0.013) 0.938 (0.019) 0.712 0.546
 Sulcal depth 0.930 (0.020) 0.920 (0.013) 0.066 0.083 0.927 (0.013) 0.924 (0.017) 0.497 0.597

Note: Data: mean (standard deviation). SI: similarity of the whole sulcal pattern, SIa: similarity between corresponding sulcal basins, SIb: similarity of intersulcal relationship. The P-value for the regression model includes gestational age at MRI as a covariate. An FDR correction was applied for P-values. *Corrected P < 0.05 with FDR correction.