Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 16;2(10):6728–6740. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b00321

Table 2. UV–Visible Spectral Titration pKa Values and Enolization Rate Constantse.

UV–visible spectral titration      
[CuII(H2Acdica)keto]1+ ⇆ {[CuII(HAcdica)enolate]} + H+ pK[Cu(H2A)] 3.88 ± 0.02a 3.85 ± 0.02a
[CuII(HAcdica)keto]0 ⇆ {[CuII(Acdica)enolate]} + H+ pK[Cu(HA)] 4.78 ± 0.03b 4.71 ± 0.05b
[CuII(HAcdica)enol]0 ⇆ [CuII(Acdica)enolate]1– + H+ pK[Cu(A)] 6.23 ± 0.04c  
from Larson and Lister (1968)      
[CuA]0 ⇆ [CuL]1– + H+ pKCuA(1968) 3.81d  
Enolization rate constant      
CuII + H2Acdica1– (keto) → [Cu(H2Acdica)enol]1+ kE3 0.05–0.07 s–1  
CuII + HAcdica2– (keto) → [Cu(HAcdica)enol]0 kE4(ave) 0.213 ± 0.001 s–1  
a

Obtained from nonlinear fits to the absorbance at 400 and 757 nm shown in Figure 1c.

b

Obtained from nonlinear fits to the absorbance at 400 and 757 nm shown in Figure 1d.

c

Obtained from nonlinear fits to the absorbance at 246 nm shown in Figure 2b.

d

μ = 0.6 M (NaClO4), temperature = 25 °C.

e

Note: pK[Cu(H2A)] and pK[Cu(HA)] involve deprotonation at the α-carbon methylene groups, whereas pK[Cu(A)] involves deprotonation at the β-carbonyl oxygen. “{ }” indicates unstable species.