Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;3(9):11392–11406. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01647

Table 1. Results for CDK Dataset (Model Dataset 1) with Best Weighting (0.5–0–0.5) Combination as Obtained from the Retrospective Study.

model division method R2 Q2 MAE95%Train QExt-F12 MAE95%Test correct prediction in % training set range number of compounds outside ADa
1 sorted responseb 0.74 0.71 0.15 0.73 0.14 87.84 2.396 0
2   0.71 0.69 0.14 0.69 0.13 86.49   0
3   0.68 0.66 0.14 0.68 0.13 85.14   1 (122)
4   0.70 0.67 0.14 0.67 0.13 85.14   4 (118, 119, 122, 123)
5   0.63 0.61 0.17 0.65 0.17 77.02   0
6 Kennard–Stonec 0.78 0.75 0.14 0.63 0.13 85.29 2.342 0
7   0.77 0.75 0.14 0.59 0.14 79.41   1 (195)
8   0.74 0.71 0.14 0.54 0.13 89.71   0
9   0.72 0.70 0.14 0.56 0.12 83.82   0
10   0.71 0.68 0.14 0.54 0.13 86.76   0
11 modified-k-medoidsd 0.74 0.71 0.13 0.70 0.17 86.67 2.397 0
12   0.69 0.66 0.13 0.65 0.14 89.33   3 (30, 38, 39)
13   0.69 0.66 0.13 0.65 0.14 88   0
14   0.70 0.68 0.14 0.68 0.13 92   0
15   0.64 0.61 0.16 0.65 0.14 88   0
a

AD using standardization technique is used and compound ID mentioned under parenthesis.

b

NTraining = 154, NTest = 74.

c

NTraining = 156, NTest = 68.

d

NTraining = 149, NTest = 75.