Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;3(9):11392–11406. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01647

Table 2. Results for AChE Dataset (Model Dataset 2) with Best Weighting (0.5–0–0.5) Combination as Obtained from the Retrospective Study.

model division method R2 Q2 MAE95%Train QExt-F12 MAE95%Test correct prediction in % training set range number of compounds outside ADa
1 sorted responseb 0.68 0.65 0.49 0.58 0.55 87.32 7.82 10 (13, 336–338, 340, 342–344, 347, 360)
2   0.67 0.64 0.49 0.61 0.52 85.92   5 (242–244, 323, 360)
3   0.64 0.60 0.46 0.52 0.53 86.62   11 (32, 33, 35, 336–338, 340, 342–344, 347)
4   0.52 0.47 0.48 0.56 0.52 85.21   15 (32, 33, 242–244, 323, 336–338, 340, 342–344, 347, 368)
5   0.64 0.60 0.46 0.53 0.55 86.62   14 (32, 33, 35, 174, 218, 323, 336–338, 340, 342–344, 347)
6 Kennard–Stonec 0.71 0.69 0.49 0.48 0.58 84.38 7.82 1 (201)
7   0.69 0.67 0.51 0.48 0.58 91.41   1 (201)
8   0.74 0.71 0.47 0.53 0.56 91.41   1 (1)
9   0.69 0.67 0.51 0.50 0.59 85.94   1 (1)
10   0.70 0.68 0.48 0.53 0.57 88.26   0
11 modified-k-medoidsd 0.68 0.65 0.48 0.63 0.51 86.62 7.76 8 (177–179, 203, 219, 246, 310, 311)
12   0.68 0.65 0.49 0.61 0.52 87.32   8 (177–179, 203, 219, 246, 310, 311)
13   0.66 0.63 0.49 0.60 0.53 85.92   7 (177–179, 203, 219, 310, 311)
14   0.67 0.65 0.50 0.55 0.58 85.21   8 (177–179, 203, 219, 246, 310, 311)
15   0.65 0.62 0.50 0.58 0.56 87.32   1 (246)
a

AD using standardization technique is used and compound ID mentioned under parenthesis.

b

NTraining = 284, NTest = 142.

c

NTraining = 284, NTest = 142.

d

NTraining = 284, NTest = 142.