Table 4. Results for Bioluminescent Repression of the Bacterium Genus Pseudomonas Dataset (Model Dataset 4) with Best Weighting (0.5–0–0.5) Combination as Obtained from the Retrospective Study.
model | division method | R2 | Q2 | MAE95%Train | QExt-F12 | MAE95%Test | correct prediction in % | training set range | number of compounds outside ADa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | sorted responseb | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 80.65 | 4.06 | 0 |
2 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 80.65 | 2 (45, 47) | ||
3 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.28 | 0.64 | 0.30 | 87.10 | 1 (47) | ||
4 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 0.29 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 83.87 | 1 (47) | ||
5 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.31 | 83.87 | 1 (47) | ||
6 | Kennard–Stonec | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.40 | 81.25 | 4.06 | 0 |
7 | 0.72 | 0.60 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 0.39 | 84.38 | 0 | ||
8 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.39 | 78.13 | 0 | ||
9 | 0.67 | 0.60 | 0.33 | 0.62 | 0.40 | 81.25 | 0 | ||
10 | 0.69 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 0.63 | 0.39 | 78.13 | 0 | ||
11 | modified-k-medoidsd | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.63 | 0.32 | 80.65 | 4.06 | 0 |
12 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.31 | 0.65 | 0.34 | 83.87 | 0 | ||
13 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.32 | 77.42 | 0 | ||
14 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.31 | 0.63 | 0.31 | 80.65 | 1 (64) | ||
15 | 0.69 | 0.65 | 0.32 | 0.62 | 0.29 | 87.10 | 1 (64) |
AD using standardization technique is used and compound ID mentioned under parenthesis.
NTraining = 73, NTest = 31.
NTraining = 72, NTest = 32.
NTraining = 73, NTest = 31.