Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;3(9):11392–11406. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01647

Table 4. Results for Bioluminescent Repression of the Bacterium Genus Pseudomonas Dataset (Model Dataset 4) with Best Weighting (0.5–0–0.5) Combination as Obtained from the Retrospective Study.

model division method R2 Q2 MAE95%Train QExt-F12 MAE95%Test correct prediction in % training set range number of compounds outside ADa
1 sorted responseb 0.78 0.73 0.32 0.42 0.32 80.65 4.06 0
2   0.73 0.69 0.35 0.45 0.31 80.65   2 (45, 47)
3   0.80 0.74 0.28 0.64 0.30 87.10   1 (47)
4   0.78 0.73 0.29 0.55 0.30 83.87   1 (47)
5   0.80 0.74 0.29 0.66 0.31 83.87   1 (47)
6 Kennard–Stonec 0.67 0.61 0.32 0.62 0.40 81.25 4.06 0
7   0.72 0.60 0.32 0.66 0.39 84.38   0
8   0.68 0.65 0.32 0.62 0.39 78.13   0
9   0.67 0.60 0.33 0.62 0.40 81.25   0
10   0.69 0.63 0.32 0.63 0.39 78.13   0
11 modified-k-medoidsd 0.75 0.70 0.30 0.63 0.32 80.65 4.06 0
12   0.72 0.68 0.31 0.65 0.34 83.87   0
13   0.72 0.68 0.32 0.62 0.32 77.42   0
14   0.71 0.67 0.31 0.63 0.31 80.65   1 (64)
15   0.69 0.65 0.32 0.62 0.29 87.10   1 (64)
a

AD using standardization technique is used and compound ID mentioned under parenthesis.

b

NTraining = 73, NTest = 31.

c

NTraining = 72, NTest = 32.

d

NTraining = 73, NTest = 31.