Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 4;6(5):250–260. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2018.0256

Table 5.

Factors Associated with PrEParation

  Bivariable analysis Multivariable regression
Stage 2: contemplation, n (%) Stage 3: PrEParation, n (%) p aOR 95% CI
Overall 86 (74.8) 29 (25.2)      
Demographics
 Sex of partners in the past 6 months
  Only men 62 (82.7) 13 (17.3) 0.01 Ref. Ref.
  Not only men 24 (60.0) 16 (40.0) 10.04* 1.32–76.12
PrEP awareness and knowledge
 Heard of PrEPa
  No 37 (92.5) 3 (7.5) <0.01 Ref. Ref.
  Yes 49 (65.3) 26 (34.7) 0.96 0.14–6.61
 Heard of PrEP from social networks
  No 65 (82.3) 14 (17.7) <0.01 Ref. Ref.
  Yes 21 (58.3) 15 (41.7) 4.22 0.97–18.35
 Heard of PrEP from medical providers
  No 79 (80.6) 19 (19.4) 0.001 Ref. Ref.
  Yes 7 (41.2) 10 (58.8) 8.31* 1.26–54.79
 Know a PrEP user
  No 71 (85.5) 12 (14.5) <0.01 Ref. Ref.
  Yes 15 (46.9) 17 (53.1) 10.68** 2.11–54.06

For the bivariable analysis, only significant results are shown. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Seven demographic variables (age, city of residence, education level, employment status, monthly income, sexual orientation, and living status) were controlled for in the final multivariable regression model.

a

Fisher's exact test was used for these calculations due to small expected values.

*

p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.