Table 5. Changes in p-value for each predictor when altering concomitant predictors using total brain as dependent variable.
Read as follows: the focal predictor in the first column was estimated to a lowest p-value (out of all the 32 models the focal predictor where included in) shown in the second column when using concomitant predictors shown in column three. Likewise, the maximum p-value shown in column four, were estimated using concomitant predictors in column five. N = 40.
Focal predictor | Min p-value | Concomitant predictors | Max p-value | Concomitant predictors |
---|---|---|---|---|
Male group size | 0.082 | Female group size, Lifespan, Female sexual maturity, Innovation, Fruit | 0.968 | Lifespan |
Female group size | 0.017 | Male group size, Lifespan, Female sexual maturity, Innovation, Fruit | 0.540 | Female sexual maturity, Innovation |
Life span | 0.004 | Male group size, Female group size, Life span, Innovation | 0.263 | Female group size, Innovation, Fruit |
Female sexual maturity | 0.043 | Male group size, Female group size, Life span, Innovation | 0.263 | Female group size, Innovation, Fruit |
Innovation | 0.240 | Fruit | 0.865 | Male group size, Life span |
Fruit | 0.007 | Male group size, Female group size, Lifespan | 0.061 | Male group size, Female sexual maturity |