Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0218655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218655

Table 5. Changes in p-value for each predictor when altering concomitant predictors using total brain as dependent variable.

Read as follows: the focal predictor in the first column was estimated to a lowest p-value (out of all the 32 models the focal predictor where included in) shown in the second column when using concomitant predictors shown in column three. Likewise, the maximum p-value shown in column four, were estimated using concomitant predictors in column five. N = 40.

Focal predictor Min p-value Concomitant predictors Max p-value Concomitant predictors
Male group size 0.082 Female group size, Lifespan, Female sexual maturity, Innovation, Fruit 0.968 Lifespan
Female group size 0.017 Male group size, Lifespan, Female sexual maturity, Innovation, Fruit 0.540 Female sexual maturity, Innovation
Life span 0.004 Male group size, Female group size, Life span, Innovation 0.263 Female group size, Innovation, Fruit
Female sexual maturity 0.043 Male group size, Female group size, Life span, Innovation 0.263 Female group size, Innovation, Fruit
Innovation 0.240 Fruit 0.865 Male group size, Life span
Fruit 0.007 Male group size, Female group size, Lifespan 0.061 Male group size, Female sexual maturity