Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 1;412:175–189. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.068

Table 1.

The output from the stepwise regression analysis employed to examine the effect of DBH 444 G/A and COMT Val158Met genotype status and their interactions (independent factors) on different aspects of attention (dependent variables). Significant results are reported in bold.

Attention index Factors Coefficients Standard Errors p-values
d’ change (‘sustained attention’) COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
0.0236
0.1164
0.0104
0.0448
0.0454
0.0196
0.59
0.01*
0.59
RT-SD (‘performance stability’) COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
4.4739
5.2376
1.8233
3.2910
3.3418
1.0834
0.17
0.11
0.09
False-alarms rate (‘response inhibition’) COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
0.0016
0.0003
0.0009
0.0039
0.0040
0.0013
0.68
0.93
0.47
Visual short-term memory capacity COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
− 0.1104
 − 0.0612
 − 0.0377
0.0749
0.0767
0.0247
0.14
0.42
0.13
Perceptual threshold COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
2.7251
 − 1.1731
 − 0.3907
0.9936
1.0100
0.4684
0.007*
0.25
0.41
Processing speed COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
− 1.0397
 − 2.3814
 − 0.8914
2.0286
2.0559
0.6663
0.60
0.24
0.18
Spatial bias COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
0.0033
 − 0.0015
0.0018
0.0086
0.0088
0.0028
0.70
0.86
0.51
Top-down selectivity index COMT
DBH
COMT X DBH
0.0600
 − 0.0016
 − 0.0074
0.0341
0.0349
0.0161
0.08
0.96
0.64