Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul;60(8):3110–3118. doi: 10.1167/iovs.19-27389

Table 2.

Comparison of LSFG Parameters Between Control Eyes (Combined Portland and Wien Cohorts) and P3 Eyes Without and With Existing Functional Loss According to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test

Age-Corrected Parameter
Mean (SD) in Control Eyes
Mean (SD) in P3 Eyes Without Functional Loss
Comparison P3 Eyes Without Functional Loss vs. Control Eyes
Mean (SD) in P3 Eyes With Functional Loss
Comparison P3 Eyes With Functional Loss vs. Control Eyes
MBRave 12.5 (2.8) 16.4 (3.6) P < 0.0001 13.8 (3.4) P = 0.0096
Skew 13.7 (1.7) 13.9 (2.1) P = 0.6393 12.8 (2.4) P = 0.0033
BOS 71.9 (4.8) 69.6 (7.1) P = 0.0385 72.5 (7.8) P = 0.6019
BOT 46.6 (3.5) 45.6 (4.7) P = 0.1911 47.1 (4.3) P = 0.3746
RR 12.45 (0.75) 12.16 (0.74) P = 0.0223 11.90 (1.22) P = 0.0006
FR 13.84 (0.68) 13.99 (0.88) P = 0.2879 13.65 (0.87) P = 0.0940
FAI 1.80 (0.57) 2.30 (0.74) P < 0.0001 1.78 (0.73) P = 0.8323
ATI 29.5 (2.8) 29.7 (2.7) P = 0.5356 30.3 (3.8) P = 0.1409
RI 0.415 (0.056) 0.438 (0.076) P = 0.0580 0.403 (0.086) P = 0.3362
P

values are from GEE models (accounting for the presence of both eyes in the P3 cohort). Bold P values indicate statistical significance.