Abstract
The human oral cavity harbors diverse communities of microbes that live as biofilms: highly ordered, surface-associated assemblages of microbes embedded in an extracellular matrix. Oral microbial communities contribute to human health by fine-tuning immune responses and reducing dietary nitrate. Dental caries and periodontal disease are together the most prevalent microbially-mediated human diseases, worldwide. Both of these oral diseases are known to be caused not by the introduction of exogenous pathogens to the oral environment, but rather by a homeostasis breakdown that leads to changes in the structure of the microbial communities present in states of health. Both dental caries and periodontal disease are mediated by synergistic interactions within communities and both diseases are further driven by specific host inputs: diet and behavior in the case of dental caries and immune system interactions in the case of periodontal disease. Changes in community structure (taxonomic identity and abundance) are well documented during the transition from health to disease. In this review, changes in biofilm physical structure during the transition from oral health to disease and the concomitant relationship between structure and community function will be emphasized.
Introduction
Numerous molecular based sequencing studies have resulted in a consensus among researchers that approximately 700 species or phylotypes comprise the bacterial component of the oral microbiome, while each individual human is estimated to carry a subset of between 50–200 species[1,2]. The human oral cavity includes different habitats for microbes including the epithelial mucosa; the papillary surface of the tongue dorsum; and the non-shedding, hard surfaces of the teeth, which themselves consist of two distinct compartments: the supragingival surface, i.e., above the gum line and the subgingival, i.e., that below the gum line[2]. Site specific, DNA sequencing studies of these different habitats have revealed that these different habitats support different microbial communities mediated by the characteristics of the surfaces available for attachment, oxygen availability, and exposure to host products delivered by saliva, to supragingival communities, and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), to subgingival communities[3].
Dental caries are lesions of the tooth enamel and may involve the underlying dentin, which develop as a consequence of dietary sugar-driven microbial growth and carbohydrate metabolism that leads to localized acidification and disruption of tooth mineralization homeostasis[4]. Periodontitis is a chronic, progressive disease, characterized by expansion of the microbial biofilm at the gingival margin with the formation of an inflammatory infiltrate that contributes to destruction of connective tissue attachment to the tooth, alveolar bone resorption and may result in eventual tooth loss[5,6]. As well, periodontal disease status is correlated with certain comorbid systemic diseases including cardiovascular disease, rheumatoid arthritis, adverse pregnancy outcome and cancer, through cellular and molecular mechanisms that are not well understood[6–12].
Dental caries and periodontal disease are both mediated by the oral microbiome and host interactions and inputs: diet in the case of caries and the immune system in the case of periodontal disease[4]. The transitions from health to caries pathology and to periodontal disease are both recognized to be caused not by introduction of exogenous pathogens, but by changes in microbial community structure, i.e., taxonomic composition and relative abundance, that transform the communities into pathogenic states[13]. In fact, periodontal disease is correlated with an increase in microbial community diversity, in contrast to most diseases known to be mediated by the human microbiome[5,14,15]. The transition from oral health to disease is further recognized to be multi-factorial, interdependent between host and microbiota and dynamic[4].
Molecular sequencing-based approaches have revolutionized our understanding of the human microbiome. Next generation DNA sequencing and other -omics technologies have permitted the assessment of the oral microbiome with enormous breadth and without the need for prior knowledge of the system, allowing the analysis of large sample sets and facilitating large-scale, longitudinal studies that together have greatly informed our understanding of the shift in microbial community structure that occurs in the transition from health to disease[5,16–18]. At the same time, the genetic and biochemical manipulation of individual organisms and small consortia under controlled laboratory conditions has permitted the identification of many of the molecular and cellular processes that underlie community function[19–24]. Importantly, the network of fine scale interactions that have been identified to date does not exist in an unstructured milieu. In fact, the highly non-random structure of supragingival dental plaque has been reported in a rich body of literature, with increasing taxonomic specificity[25]. Early electron and light microscopy-based studies allowed the development of two central hypotheses to the formation of dental plaque and its role in mediating disease, namely that highly ordered communities result as a consequence of ecological succession and that no single pathogenic organism is responsible for periodontal disease[26,27]. This review presents a summary of the current state of knowledge regarding dental plaque structure and especially considers the importance of structure in the transition from dental health to caries pathology and periodontal disease.
Taxonomic composition of dental plaque communities in health
The species composition and relative abundance of microbial communities is often referred to as community structure in the literature[3]. This type of structural information, generated by sample homogenization and subsequent molecular identification through DNA sequencing is not to be confused with information on the physical architecture of microbial biofilms[28]. This type of structural information, generated by direct observation with microscopy will be considered in detail subsequently. Particular emphasis will be given to the supra and subgingival plaque communities as these communities are extraordinarily complex and species rich and have been observed to have highly non-random spatial structure, hypothesized to be due in part to the non-shedding nature of the tooth compared to the soft epithelium[4].
The oral microbiome of healthy subjects is dominated, like the human microbiome in general, by members of the phyla Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes as well as the additional orally abundant Fusobacteria and Spirochaetes[16]. A recent meta-analysis of Human Microbiome Project (HMP) supra and subgingival dental plaque data revealed that 13 genera are both highly abundant and have high prevalence within the sampled population: Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, Capnocytophaga, Haemophilus/Aggregatibacter, Fusobacterium, Prevotella, Leptotrichia, Veillonella, Neisseria, Rothia, Actinomyces, Lautropia, and Porphyromonas[29]. At the genus level, the taxonomic composition of both the supra and shallow-depth subgingival communities in states of health are similar, with marked differences in relative abundance, e.g., the genus Prevotella is increased in subgingival communities, a reflection of the different environmental conditions experienced by the two microbial communities[16,29].
Together with bacteria, fungi also comprise the healthy human oral microbiome. Though the fungal load in healthy subjects is estimated to be orders of magnitude lower than the bacterial load, the size and morphology of fungal cells and their synergistic interactions with bacteria suggest an important role for these organisms in structuring dental plaque[30,31]. Assessment of fungal diversity has been hampered by both the incompleteness of fungal sequence databases which itself is due partly to the inability to culture many species, necessitating de novo database construction, as well as a lack of standard protocols for fungal DNA extraction caused by the extreme heterogeneity in fungal cell wall composition[30,32]. Nonetheless, recent next generation sequencing studies of oral fungal 18S rRNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences identified numerous genera with both high abundance and prevalence in saliva and include Candida, Cryptococcus, Fusarium, Aspergillus/Emericella/Eurotium and others[33,34].
Role of the oral microbiome in health
Emerging evidence suggests that the human microbiome performs diverse functions that are beneficial for the human host[35]. The beneficial effects of the human microbiome have primarily been observed in the gut; however, recent work has identified key beneficial functions of the oral microbiota[36–39]. It is hypothesized that a primary function of resident microbes is to act as a physical and biochemical barrier to prevent colonization or infection by exogenous organisms[40]. Indeed, the mouth is open to the external environment and receives countless airborne and droplet-associated microbes through breathing as well as food-and water-associated microbes through eating and drinking. By physically and chemically restricting access to the host epithelium through direct occlusion, by sequestering nutrients and by secreting antimicrobials, the commensal oral microbiota may play an important role in directing foreign microbes to the flushing saliva and mucus, to be swallowed and delivered to the extremely low pH, microbicidal environment of the stomach[40].
A second hypothesized function of the commensal microbiota is to promote maturation of both the innate and adaptive host immune systems, especially to achieve proper balance between pro-and anti-inflammatory processes in the absence of, and during, infection[41]. In the mouth, the study of patients with underlying primary immmuno-deficiency (PID) as well as mouse models of PID have unraveled a complex interplay between subgingival microbiota and the host immune system including the importance of proper neutrophil recruitment to prevent potentially over compensatory inflammatory responses to oral microbiota. Additionally, the crucial involvement of TH17 cells in mediating microbiota-induced periodontal disease further supports the central involvement of neutrophils in periodontal disease[39,42]. In the context of beneficial microbes, it has been demonstrated that species of oral streptococci play an immuno-modulatory role and down regulate pro-inflammatory responses to beneficial oral microbes[43–47]. For example, Streptococcus salivarius was demonstrated to downregulate innate immune responses specifically by downregulating genes involved in the NF-kappaB pathway in oral epithelial cells[48].
In addition to roles that are common to all human associated microbiomes, the oral microbiome is hypothesized to contribute unique functions to human health and homeostasis. A key role for the oral microbiome in nitrate reduction and subsequent nitric oxide (NO) concentration in the systemic circulation has been proposed, implicating the oral microbiota in the maintenance of vascular health[43,49,50]. Dietary nitrate is concentrated in saliva and may be reduced by nitrate-reducing bacteria, which are abundant on the tongue dorsum[51]. The contribution that oral communities make to systemic NO homeostasis remains to be determined, but correlations between subgingival bacterial load and blood pressure have been described[52].
Dental plaque physical structure in states of oral health.
Early light and electron microscopy studies of intact dental plaque revealed these communities to be highly structured, with non-random distributions of morphologically and phenotypically different cells[26,27,53,54]. Dental plaque is now recognized as a polymicrobial biofilm, defined as a community of microbial cells embedded in an extracellular matrix, that grows on an interface between two phases of matter, e.g. the solid tooth surface and liquid saliva or GCF[55]. The structure of dental plaque biofilms is hypothesized to be driven by specific inter-taxon physical and chemical interactions; environmental pressures including oxygen tension; host factors both growth promoting, e.g., nutrients and growth-promoting factors in saliva and gingivo-crevicular fluid (GCF) and growth inhibiting including antimicrobial peptides, lysozyme, secreted antibodies and other immune mediators[56]. Coaggregation, the adhesion of taxonomically distinct cells to each other mediated by specific cell surface molecules, prevents the dislodging and loss of oral colonizers by mastication and shear forces generated by flowing saliva and GCF and also provides spatial proximity to facilitate microbial communication and chemical exchange[57–60]. The results of extensive in vitro binding assays using cultivable bacterial isolates were compiled to generate a hypothetical model for the spatial structure of dental plaque[61]. According to this model, a subset of microbes, namely species of the genera Streptococcus and Actinomyces are able to bind directly to the glycoprotein rich salivary pellicle that coats the tooth, through bacterial surface receptor recognition[62]. A process of ecological succession then takes place by which these founding organisms and other early colonizers including species of the genus Veillonella serve as substrates for the subsequent attachment of later colonizing organisms culminating in a climax community, rich in diversity that includes organisms that are abundant in states of health as well as those enriched in states of periodontal disease, i.e., cells of the genera, Treponema and Tannerella among others[63]. Importantly, according to this model, Fusobacterium nucleatum and to some extent Porphyromonas gingivalis serve as important bridging organisms that physically unite the early colonizers with late colonizing organisms, because these two species have demonstrated the ability to specifically coaggregate with both types of colonizers[4,60].
Lending support to this conceptual model, many of the inter-taxon associations hypothesized from in vitro coaggregation assays have been directly observed using fluorescence microscopy with labeled antibodies or oligo nucleotide probes in in-vitro, co-culture experiments[57,64,65], on removable substrates worn by healthy volunteers[66], and in multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on extracted dental plaque[67]. During development, the structure of`dental plaque communities is further fine tuned by the synergistic activities of the microbes themselves[68]. For example, members of the genus Streptococcus rapidly sequester oxygen at the apical, saliva-exposed surfaces of supragingival biofilms to create anaerobic niches within these health-associated structures[29].
Health-associated subgingival plaque biofilms have not yet been analyzed systematically with a high degree of taxonomic resolution due to the difficulty in obtaining intact, tooth-associated subgingival biofilms from healthy donors. However, multiplex FISH has recently been applied to supragingival dental plaque extracted from healthy volunteers in a manner that maintained the three-dimensional structure of the biofilms[29]. Within these undisturbed regions of supragingival biofilms, large, annular structures were repeatedly observed. Within these “hedgehog,” structures, cells of the genus Fusobacterium were present; however, filamentous cells of the genus Corynebacterium were more abundant, and their distribution and colocalization with other taxa suggest a central role for this organism in structuring the community. Seven other bacterial taxa were consistently observed in hedgehog structures: Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Pasturellaceae, Neisseriaceae, Leptotrichia, Capnocytophaga and Actinomyces. Cells of the genus Streptococcus and sometimes Porphyromonas and family Pasturellaceae were observed to decorate the apical tips of some Corynebacterium filaments in “corncob” arrangements, a structure that had been described without taxonomic resolution in early electron microscopy studies of dental plaque. These observations were assimilated into an updated model for dental plaque structure, driven by synergistic inter-taxon interactions, ecological succession and dynamic environmental and biochemical inputs that shape the physical structure of the health-associated community as it develops[29].
Community structure in the context of dental caries
Mutans streptococci, especially S. mutans, as well as lactobacilli are strongly correlated with caries[13]. S. mutans readily ferments sucrose and other sugars to produce ATP and lactic acid as a waste product[69]. The accumulation of lactate is thus responsible for the local acidification of the caries environment[70,71]. Species of the aciduric, i.e., acid-tolerant genus Veillonella utilize lactate as a carbon source and thus are involved in syntrophic metabolism of carbohydrate with S. mutans[19]. Molecular sequencing analyses have identified other acidogenic and aciduric organisms that are strongly correlated with different stages of caries progression in vivo, including Bifidobacterium spp. Scardovia spp., Actinomyces and the fungus, and especially in the case of early childhood caries, Candida albicans[13,31]. Other non-aciduric genera including Corynebacterium, Granulicatella and Propionibacterium have also been found at increased abundance in caries-associated supragingival plaque[4]. Thus, the development of caries is marked by a shift in supragingival community composition from one that promotes health, to one that mediates disease (Fig. 1). This homeostasis breakdown in microbial community composition, or dysbiosis, is a common phenomenon of microbiome-mediated diseases[72].
Figure 1. Observed changes in dental plaque structure between states of health and sites of active caries.

DNA sequencing provides a description of community structure in the form of taxonomic membership and abundance. Supragingival plaque communities from patients with dental caries experience shifts in community composition, marked by a general decrease in community diversity. The shift in microbial community structure is mediated by frequent dietary consumption of fermentable carbohydrates and synergistic interactions between increasingly abundant acidogenic and aciduric organisms. (See refs. [13],[106] and [29]). The spatial structure of caries-associated communities also undergoes specific developmental changes during the transition to dysbiosis. The structure of caries associated biofilms is mediated by the increased production of extrapolymeric substances (EPS) by Mutans Streptococci, including on the surface of C. albicans hyphae as seen in early childhood caries and by synergistic interactions among bacteria that create a highly localized low pH microenvironment mediated by secretion of lactic acid and its sequestration within dense EPS meshworks. Unknown bacterium and Other acidogenic/aciduric organisms represent species that have been identified in molecular surveys but which have not been identified with taxonomic resolution in biofilm images. Small question marks in the diagram reflect recommended caution in drawing conclusions about inter-taxon associations because caries-associated supragingival biofilms have yet to be imaged after labeling with more than a few probes simultaneously. (See refs. [107], [29] and [80]).
Supragingival plaque biofilm structure and caries development
Although the systems-level spatial analysis of caries-associated dental plaque biofilms with taxonomic resolution as described above for health-associated biofilms is yet to be achieved, mounting evidence assembled from different studies suggests an intrinsic contribution of spatial structure on the development of caries (Fig. 1). In the absence of abundant fermentable carbohydrates, Mitis group streptococci bind to the saliva coated tooth with greater avidity than S. mutans, they grow more rapidly and they antagonize competitors with local secretion of hydrogen peroxide[4,73,74]. Thus, acidogenic and aciduric oral microbes are required but not sufficient for caries development; also needed is frequent consumption of dietary sugars by the host[4]. When ecological perturbation exceeds a threshold, interspecies interactions that shape the biofilm community during states of health are altered[21]. During frequent exposure to fermentable carbohydrates, localized regions of low pH generated by lactate producers further select for aciduric organisms resulting in a positive feedback loop, which ultimately leads to highly localized demineralization[75,76]. Dietary sucrose is especially cariogenic because its component 6-carbon sugars, glucose and fructose, are used to synthesize extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in the form of glucans and fructans[77]. The extracellular biofilm matrix, comprised of EPS, glycoproteins and extracellular DNA, provides binding sites for embedded microbes, protects against biofilm removal during normal oral hygiene procedures and contributes to the generation of highly localized regions of low pH by inhibiting exchange of saliva, which has a natural buffering capacity[76]. EPS also has the ability to alter diffusion and sequester antimicrobials, which has implications for therapeutic intervention[4,28,78,79]. Glucosyltransferase (Gtf) exoenzymes secreted by S. mutans have been observed to bind to the surface of Candida albicans cells and function to synthesize glucans[31]. In this way, C. albicans hyphae act as important physical scaffolds for the development of EPS-embedded microcolonies of S. mutans and other organisms, which may contribute especially to early childhood caries which strongly correlate with C. ablicans carriage[80]. Thus, diet and synergistic interactions shape the microbial community in both its taxonomic makeup and physical structure by allowing the formation of highly localized acidic microenvironments[21]. These microenvironments in turn further shape the local structure of the biofilm to create a positive feedback loop which can lead to highly localized acidification and tissue demineralization.
Community structure in the context of periodontal disease
As with caries, no single organism is implicated in the transition from health to periodontal disease, rather, the subgingival microbial community present in states of periodontal health transitions to a state of dysbiosis in which the community structure, i.e., species composition and abundance, shifts toward a pathogenic state[81]. Early culture-independent approaches first identified a three-member consortium of Gram negative organisms, called the “Red Complex” enriched in the subgingival microbiomes of patients with periodontal disease, consisting of Prophyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola and Tannerella forsythia[82]. These organisms have been termed pathobionts rather than pathogens because although implicated in disease, they are normally present at lower abundances in the microbiota of subjects with no clinical markers of periodontitis[83]. The list of pathobionts has recently been expanded through modern culture-independent molecular surveys to include the Gram-positive Filifacter alocis and other anaerobes including cells of the genera Parvimonas, Fusobacterium, and Prevotella (Fig. 2) [5,16,84].
Figure 2. Observed changes in dental plaque structure between states of health and periodontal disease.

Subgingival plaque communities from patients with periodontal disease have increased bacterial load and shifts in community composition that reflect a process of ecological succession. Importantly, the shift in community structure involves the expansion of a subset of organisms that are present in states of health without the displacement of other health-associated taxa. (See refs. [16] and [5]). The highly ordered physical structure of dental plaque communities has been probed with taxonomic resolution using FISH. In states of health, supragingival plaque biofilms have taxonomic distributions that reflect host and environmental inputs including oxygen concentration and salivary components as well as within-community interactions such as H2O2 production and oxygen sequestration to create anaerobic niches. Cells of the genus Corynebacterium were observed to play a central role in structuring the system. The spatial structure of subgingival plaque biofilms in states of health is not well studied due to the inaccessibility of these biofilms for imaging and is reflected in the graphic as a large question mark. FISH on extracted teeth from patients with periodontal disease revealed the spatial distribution of organisms with respect to the basal (tooth-associated) and apical (facing the gingival pocket) surfaces. Gingivitis is a reversible form of periodontal disease that is mediated by increased bacterial load at the gingival margin, characterized by a unique community structure not shown in this diagram. In susceptible hosts, gingivitis may progress to chronic periodontitis. Small question marks in the diagram reflect recommended caution in drawing conclusions about inter-taxon associations because subgingival biofilms have yet to be imaged after labeling with more than a few probes simultaneously. GCF = gingivo crevicular fluid. (See refs. [29], [95] and [108]).
The cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive and reinforce the Jekyll to Hyde transition of subgingival communities toward a dysbiotic state is an active area of research. According to the Ecological Plaque Hypothesis, changes in environmental conditions, i.e., nutrient availability, oxygen concentration, pH, and host inflammatory mediators drive the community shift by selecting and enriching for pathobionts[85,86]. Consistent with this hypothesis, molecular sequencing based approaches have confirmed that pathobionts are present in health-associated subgingival communities at low abundance; while, as ecological changes take place, these organisms expand within the communities above a threshold that initiates and reinforces periodontal disease pathology [5,16]. The newly described polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) hypothesis builds on this ecological concept to include the dynamic and synergistic interactions between organisms and the host as a mechanism to shape and stabilize dysbiotic communities within their ecological context[87]. The gingival tissue destruction associated with inflammation is thought to contribute to dysbiosis by releasing nutrients including degraded collagen and other peptides as well as haem-containing compounds into the periodontal pocket in the form of GCF[4]. Supporting this hypothesis, periodontal pathobionts include organisms that require exogenous amino acids for growth in culture and a recent metatranscriptomic analysis of subgingival communities found enhanced expression of genes involved in iron-uptake in periodontitis-associated communities[18,88].
That dysbiotic communities require inflammation for their nutritional support seems paradoxical because a localized inflammatory response by the host normally functions to inhibit microbial growth. This paradox is resolved by the demonstrated ability of P. gingivalis to manipulate the host immune response in such a fashion as to uncouple tissue destruction from microbicide during inflammation, through manipulation of the complement pathway mediated through gingipain exoenzymes that act on the inactive precursor complement protein, C5 to generate C5a[89]. P. gingivalis further promotes crosstalk between the complement C5a receptor 1 and Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR-2) while bypassing the downstream effector Myd88 to achieve a pro-inflammatory, anti-phagocytic response in phagocytic cells[4]. Even futher, P. gingivalis has demonstrated the ability to downregulate expression of interleukin-8 (IL-8) by epithelial cells, a chemokine that recruits phagocytic neutrophils and Th1 cells to the gingiva, as well as T cell production of interferon (IFN)γ [39,90–92]. Thus, P. gingivalis, present in low abundance in both health-and disease-associated communities, acts as a keystone species in the developing dysbiotic community to create a pro-inflammatory, anti-phagocytic environment that favors the growth and expansion of pathobionts[93].
Subgingival plaque biofilm structure and periodontal disease development
As described above, an understanding of the synergistic activities of subgingival microbes and the host as these communities undergo dysbiosis is emerging; however, what remains poorly understood is how these activities are distributed within the physical architecture of microbial communities[94]. The molecular cross-talk that takes place between the subgingival microbiota and the host immune system does not take place in an unstructured milieu, but rather within a highly ordered environment. The structure of biological systems, including both the involved host tissues and the subgingival microbial community are correlate with their function, and mounting evidence suggests the importance of biofilm structure in the transition through dysbiosis[95].
The close apposition of cells within polymicrobial biofilms allows biochemical interaction, signaling and genetic exchange between cells. Facultative aerobes within dental plaque biofilms can sequester oxygen and create anaerobic niches[29]. This process may be important during the transition to dysbiosis because many pathobionts are strict anaerobes. During the progression of periodontal disease, the gingival pocket increases in volume, which may drive higher bacterial load within this niche[4,27]. That the total bacterial load is increased in patients with periodontal disease as newly dominant members of the community emerge and accumulate, rather than replace earlier colonizers suggests a dynamic physical interplay between biofilms and host tissue to create this new space[5]. How these newly dominant species are distributed within expanding biofilms is beginning to be explored. Extensive FISH labeling of subgingival biofilms on teeth extracted from patients with periodontal disease and systematic image analyses have provided a qualitative visual atlas of the spatial distributions of some dominant organisms including putative pathobionts (Fig. 2). Zijnge and colleagues were able to describe four distinct layers in subgingival plaque from periodontitis-affected individuals. Actinomyces spp. were located primarily in the basal layer of the biofilm, i.e. closest to the tooth surface. Fusobacterium was identified in the intermediate layers of the biofilms along with Tannerella while Prevotella and Porphyromonas localized to both the apical and intermediate layers. Cells of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides (CFB)-cluster were observed in the apical layers while Treponema were loosely arranged superior to the densely packed biofilm[95]. Interestingly, some of these spatial arrangements superficially recapitulate those summarized in the conceptual model of Kolenbrander and colleagues described earlier, reflecting the combined actions of ecological succession, coaggregation and microbial growth during the transition from subgingival health to periodontal disease[61].
In addition to microbial physical interactions, including interkingdom interactions between fungi and bacteria, physical interactions between subgingival biofilm microbes and host cells have been observed. Zijnge and colleagues observed microbes of the genus Synergistes in close spatial proximity to polymorphonuclear leukocytes in multiplex FISH images of extracted teeth with associated gingival tissue, suggesting direct physical interaction between these biofilm resident microbes and host immune cells[95]. In fact, close apposition of host leukocytes, identified by their characteristic lobed nuclei, to subgingival biofilm microbes had previously been observed in transmission electron micrographs of human and canine subgingival tissue[96].
Early events during the transition from health to periodontal disease
In a longitudinal metatranscriptomic study of long-term healthy subgingival sites and sites that progressed to periodontal disease in human subjects, P. gingivalis displayed upregulation of a large number of virulence genes in healthy sites that later progressed to disease while T. denticola and T. forsythia did not upregulate any but one or a few virulence genes until later timepoints during disease progression, suggesting that when present, P. gingivalis serves as a microbial driver in the transition from periodontal health to disease[4,97]. Furthermore, this transition may involve an intermediate state. Gingivitis is a reversible form of periodontal disease, marked by microbiota-induced inflammation at the apical gingival border, i.e., the zone that distinguishes the supra-and subgingival compartments[98]. Gingivitis may be induced experimentally in volunteers who have abstained from normal oral hygiene for a short period of time and usually resolves upon resumption of normal oral hygiene practices[99]. However, in susceptible individuals in non-experimental situations, gingivitis may progress to chronic periodontal disease (Fig. 2) [100]. Molecular analyses of dental plaque communities in volunteers with experimentally-induced gingivitis reveal a unique cohort of microbes that are associated with gingivitis but not health or chronic periodontitis, comprised of F. nucleatum subsp. polymorphum, Lachnospiraceae spp., Lautropia sp. and Prevotella oulorum[99]. Importantly, the mature and highly ordered hedgehog structures previously described in supragingival plaque biofilms were extracted from volunteers who abstained from normal oral hygiene for 12–48 hours[29], and these structures or others like them that project tens of microns above the enamel surface may be involved in the induction of gingivitis, especially if they locate at the gingival border, suggesting a role for plaque biofilm structure in mediating the transition from periodontal health to disease[101].
Conclusions and future directions
Both dental caries and periodontal disease are highly prevalent within the human population. Both diseases are polymicrobial in their etiology and result when the supra and subgingival microbial communities associated with states of health experience a homeostasis breakdown and undergo dysbiosis. The etiologies of these diseases are multifactorial and depend upon synergistic activities, both chemical and physical, within the microbial communities and between the host immune system, as well as environmental inputs and other host factors.
As described here, descriptive studies of dental plaque structure in states of health and disease are beginning to be achieved with systems level taxonomic resolution. What remains to be achieved is a mechanistic understanding of how fine scale intercellular interactions lead to large scale physical structures. To that end, in vitro biofilm culture systems and animal models may be exploited for controlled laboratory testing of structure-related hypotheses[102,103]. The analysis of complex and highly heterogeneous image data is not a straightforward task and the development of image analysis tools that can be shared and standardized by researchers are tremendously valuable[104]. Furthermore, the development of mature dental plaque biofilms is a dynamic process that results as a consequence of ecological succession. Analysis of static images of fully developed communities provides limited information on the developmental processes that take place to achieve the climax community structure. To this end, live cell imaging will provide crucial information to “connect the dots” in plaque structure development over time[105].
To achieve a deep understanding of the forces that drive dysbiosis within dental plaque communities, collaboration will be required among scientists with diverse expertise including microbiology, biochemistry, immunology, ecology, imaging and genomics as well as concerted effort among researchers to synthesize emerging knowledge into unified theories.
Research Highlights.
Dental caries and periodontal disease are the most prevalent microbially mediated diseases that afflict humans.
Dental plaque has a highly ordered structure mediated by intercellular interactions, environmental and host inputs.
Periodontal disease is associated with shifts in microbial community structure, i.e., taxonomic membership and abundance.
Periodontal disease is thought to be mediated by synergist interactions between subgingival microbial communities and host.
Spatial structure of intact supragingival and subgingival biofilms is equally important as taxonomic composition for understanding microbiome changes in health and disease.
Acknowledgement
The work of the author is supported by US National Institutes of Health grant DE028042.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- [1].Dewhirst FE, Chen T, Izard J, Paster BJ, Tanner ACR, Yu W-H, et al. , The human oral microbiome, J. Bacteriol 192 (2010) 5002–5017. doi: 10.1128/JB.00542-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Aas JA, Paster BJ, Stokes LN, Olsen I, Dewhirst FE, Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity, J. Clin. Microbiol 43 (2005) 5721–5732. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Human Microbiome Project Consortium, Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome, Nature 486 (2012) 207–214. doi: 10.1038/nature11234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Lamont RJ, Koo H, Hajishengallis G, The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 16 (2018) 745–759. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0089-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Abusleme L, Dupuy AK, Dutzan N, Silva N, Burleson JA, Strausbaugh LD, et al. , The subgingival microbiome in health and periodontitis and its relationship with community biomass and inflammation, Isme J 7 (2013) 1016–1025. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Hajishengallis G, Periodontitis: from microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation, Nat. Rev. Immunol 15 (2015) 30–44. doi: 10.1038/nri3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Han YW, Wang X, Mobile microbiome: oral bacteria in extra-oral infections and inflammation, J. Dent. Res 92 (2013) 485–491. doi: 10.1177/0022034513487559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Kholy KE, Genco RJ, Van Dyke TE, Oral infections and cardiovascular disease, Trends Endocrinol. Metab 26 (2015) 315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Mukherjee A, Jantsch V, Khan R, Hartung W, Fischer R, Jantsch J, et al. , Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Autoimmunity Due to Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Its Resolution With Antibiotic Therapy, Front Immunol 9 (2018) 2352. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Potempa J, Mydel P, Koziel J, The case for periodontitis in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, Nat Rev Rheumatol 13 (2017) 606–620. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2017.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Kriebel K, Hieke C, Müller-Hilke B, Nakata M, Kreikemeyer B, Oral Biofilms from Symbiotic to Pathogenic Interactions and Associated Disease -Connection of Periodontitis and Rheumatic Arthritis by Peptidylarginine Deiminase, Front Microbiol 9 (2018) 53. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Börnigen D, Ren B, Pickard R, Li J, Ozer E, Hartmann EM, et al. , Alterations in oral bacterial communities are associated with risk factors for oral and oropharyngeal cancer, Sci Rep 7 (2017) 17686. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17795-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Tanner ACR, Kressirer CA, Rothmiller S, Johansson I, Chalmers NI, The Caries Microbiome: Implications for Reversing Dysbiosis, Adv. Dent. Res 29 (2018) 78–85. doi: 10.1177/0022034517736496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Naik S, Bouladoux N, Wilhelm C, Molloy MJ, Salcedo R, Kastenmuller W, et al. , Compartmentalized control of skin immunity by resident commensals, Science 337 (2012) 1115–1119. doi: 10.1126/science.1225152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Dalal SR, Chang EB, The microbial basis of inflammatory bowel diseases, J. Clin. Invest 124 (2014) 4190–4196. doi: 10.1172/JCI72330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Griffen AL, Beall CJ, Campbell JH, Firestone ND, Kumar PS, Yang ZK, et al. , Distinct and complex bacterial profiles in human periodontitis and health revealed by 16S pyrosequencing, Isme J 6 (2012) 1176–1185. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Mark Welch JL, Utter DR, Rossetti BJ, Mark Welch DB, Eren AM, Borisy GG, Dynamics of tongue microbial communities with single-nucleotide resolution using oligotyping, Front Microbiol 5 (2014) 568. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Duran-Pinedo AE, Chen T, Teles R, Starr JR, Wang X, Krishnan K, et al. , Community-wide transcriptome of the oral microbiome in subjects with and without periodontitis, Isme J 8 (2014) 1659–1672. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Chalmers NI, Palmer RJ, Cisar JO, Kolenbrander PE, Characterization of a Streptococcus sp.-Veillonella sp. community micromanipulated from dental plaque, J. Bacteriol 190 (2008) 8145–8154. doi: 10.1128/JB.00983-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lima BP, Shi W, Lux R, Identification and characterization of a novel Fusobacterium nucleatum adhesin involved in physical interaction and biofilm formation with Streptococcus gordonii, Microbiologyopen 6 (2017) e00444. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Edlund A, Yang Y, Yooseph S, Hall AP, Nguyen DD, Dorrestein PC, et al. , Meta-omics uncover temporal regulation of pathways across oral microbiome genera during in vitro sugar metabolism, Isme J 9 (2015) 2605–2619. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Huang X, Browngardt CM, Jiang M, Ahn S-J, Burne RA, Nascimento MM, Diversity in Antagonistic Interactions between Commensal Oral Streptococci and Streptococcus mutans, Caries Res 52 (2018) 88–101. doi: 10.1159/000479091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Zeng L, Burne RA, Essential Roles of the sppRA Fructose-Phosphate Phosphohydrolase Operon in Carbohydrate Metabolism and Virulence Expression by Streptococcus mutans, J. Bacteriol 201 (2019) 543. doi: 10.1128/JB.00586-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Mutha NVR, Mohammed WK, Krasnogor N, Tan GYA, Choo SW, Jakubovics NS, Transcriptional responses of Streptococcus gordonii and Fusobacterium nucleatum to coaggregation, Mol Oral Microbiol 33 (2018) 450–464. doi: 10.1111/omi.12248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Listgarten MA, The structure of dental plaque, Periodontol. 2000 5 (1994) 52–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Listgarten MA, Mayo HE, Tremblay R, Development of dental plaque on epoxy resin crowns in man. A light and electron microscopic study, J. Periodontol 46 (1975) 10–26. doi: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.1.10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Newman HN, The apical border of plaque in chronic inflammatory periodontal disease, Br Dent J 141 (1976) 105–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Jakubovics NS, Kolenbrander PE, The road to ruin: the formation of disease-associated oral biofilms, Oral Dis 16 (2010) 729–739. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, Rieken CW, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG, Biogeography of a human oral microbiome at the micron scale, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.a 113 (2016) E791–800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522149113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Diaz PI, Hong B-Y, Dupuy AK, Strausbaugh LD, Mining the oral mycobiome: Methods, components, and meaning, Virulence 8 (2017) 313–323. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1252015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Koo H, Andes DR, Krysan DJ, Candida-streptococcal interactions in biofilm-associated oral diseases, PLoS Pathog 14 (2018) e1007342. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].NIH Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Findley K, Oh J, Yang J, Conlan S, Deming C, et al. , Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin, Nature 498 (2013) 367–370. doi: 10.1038/nature12171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Ghannoum MA, Jurevic RJ, Mukherjee PK, Cui F, Sikaroodi M, Naqvi A, et al. , Characterization of the oral fungal microbiome (mycobiome) in healthy individuals, PLoS Pathog 6 (2010) e1000713. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Dupuy AK, David MS, Li L, Heider TN, Peterson JD, Montano EA, et al. , Redefining the human oral mycobiome with improved practices in amplicon-based taxonomy: discovery of Malassezia as a prominent commensal, PLoS ONE 9 (2014) e90899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C, The healthy human microbiome, Genome Med 8 (2016) 51. doi: 10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Thaiss CA, Zmora N, Levy M, Elinav E, The microbiome and innate immunity, Nature 535 (2016) 65–74. doi: 10.1038/nature18847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Honda K, Littman DR, The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease, Nature 535 (2016) 75–84. doi: 10.1038/nature18848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Naik S, Bouladoux N, Linehan JL, Han S-J, Harrison OJ, Wilhelm C, et al. , Commensal-dendritic-cell interaction specifies a unique protective skin immune signature, Nature 520 (2015) 104–108. doi: 10.1038/nature14052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Dutzan N, Kajikawa T, Abusleme L, Greenwell-Wild T, Zuazo CE, Ikeuchi T, et al. , A dysbiotic microbiome triggers TH17 cells to mediate oral mucosal immunopathology in mice and humans, Sci Transl Med 10 (2018) eaat0797. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat0797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Beasley DE, Koltz AM, Lambert JE, Fierer N, Dunn RR, The Evolution of Stomach Acidity and Its Relevance to the Human Microbiome, PLoS ONE 10 (2015) e0134116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Kilian M, The oral microbiome - friend or foe? Eur. J. Oral Sci 126 Suppl 1 (2018) 5–12. doi: 10.1111/eos.12527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Silva LM, Brenchley L, Moutsopoulos NM, Primary immunodeficiencies reveal the essential role of tissue neutrophils in periodontitis, Immunol. Rev 287 (2019) 226–235. doi: 10.1111/imr.12724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Marsh PD, In Sickness and in Health-What Does the Oral Microbiome Mean to Us? An Ecological Perspective, Adv. Dent. Res 29 (2018) 60–65. doi: 10.1177/0022034517735295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Devine DA, Marsh PD, Meade J, Modulation of host responses by oral commensal bacteria, J Oral Microbiol 7 (2015) 26941. doi: 10.3402/jom.v7.26941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Hasegawa Y, Mans JJ, Mao S, Lopez MC, Baker HV, Handfield M, et al. , Gingival epithelial cell transcriptional responses to commensal and opportunistic oral microbial species, Infect. Immun 75 (2007) 2540–2547. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01957-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Kaci G, Goudercourt D, Dennin V, Pot B, Doré J, Ehrlich SD, et al. , Anti-inflammatory properties of Streptococcus salivarius, a commensal bacterium of the oral cavity and digestive tract, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 80 (2014) 928–934. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03133-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Kaci G, Lakhdari O, Doré J, Ehrlich SD, Renault P, Blottière HM, et al. , Inhibition of the NF-kappaB pathway in human intestinal epithelial cells by commensal Streptococcus salivarius, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 77 (2011) 4681–4684. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03021-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Cosseau C, Devine DA, Dullaghan E, Gardy JL, Chikatamarla A, Gellatly S, et al. , The commensal Streptococcus salivarius K12 downregulates the innate immune responses of human epithelial cells and promotes host-microbe homeostasis, Infect. Immun 76 (2008) 4163–4175. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00188-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Raizada MK, Joe B, Bryan NS, Chang EB, Dewhirst FE, Borisy GG, et al. , Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group on the Role of Microbiota in Blood Pressure Regulation: Current Status and Future Directions, Hypertension 70 (2017) 479–485. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E, Gladwin MT, The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics, Nat Rev Drug Discov 7 (2008) 156–167. doi: 10.1038/nrd2466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Hyde ER, Andrade F, Vaksman Z, Parthasarathy K, Jiang H, Parthasarathy DK, et al. , Metagenomic analysis of nitrate-reducing bacteria in the oral cavity: implications for nitric oxide homeostasis, PLoS ONE 9 (2014) e88645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Desvarieux M, Demmer RT, Jacobs DR, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Sacco RL, et al. , Periodontal bacteria and hypertension: the oral infections and vascular disease epidemiology study (INVEST), J. Hypertens 28 (2010) 1413–1421. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328338cd36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Listgarten MA, Structure of the microbial flora associated with periodontal health and disease in man. A light and electron microscopic study, J. Periodontol 47 (1976) 1–18. doi: 10.1902/jop.1976.47.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Nyvad B, Fejerskov O, Scanning electron microscopy of early microbial colonization of human enamel and root surfaces in vivo, Scand J Dent Res 95 (1987) 287–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Davey ME, O’toole GA, Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 64 (2000) 847–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Diaz PI, Microbial diversity and interactions in subgingival biofilm communities, Front Oral Biol 15 (2012) 17–40. doi: 10.1159/000329669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Egland PG, Palmer RJ, Kolenbrander PE, Interspecies communication in Streptococcus gordonii-Veillonella atypica biofilms: signaling in flow conditions requires juxtaposition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.a 101 (2004) 16917–16922. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407457101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Hansen SK, Rainey PB, Haagensen JAJ, Molin S, Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community, Nature 445 (2007) 533–536. doi: 10.1038/nature05514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Coppenhagen-Glazer S, Sol A, Abed J, Naor R, Zhang X, Han YW, et al. , Fap2 of Fusobacterium nucleatum is a galactose-inhibitable adhesin involved in coaggregation, cell adhesion, and preterm birth, Infect. Immun 83 (2015) 1104–1113. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02838-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Jakubovics NS, Intermicrobial Interactions as a Driver for Community Composition and Stratification of Oral Biofilms, J. Mol. Biol 427 (2015) 3662–3675. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Periasamy S, Jakubovics NS, Oral multispecies biofilm development and the key role of cell-cell distance, Nat. Rev. Microbiol 8 (2010) 471–480. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Nobbs AH, Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF, Streptococcus adherence and colonization, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 73 (2009) 407–50– Table of Contents. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00014-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Kolenbrander PE, Palmer RJ, Rickard AH, Jakubovics NS, Chalmers NI, Diaz PI, Bacterial interactions and successions during plaque development, Periodontol. 2000 42 (2006) 47–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2006.00187.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Periasamy S, Kolenbrander PE, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans builds mutualistic biofilm communities with Fusobacterium nucleatum and Veillonella species in saliva, Infect. Immun 77 (2009) 3542–3551. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00345-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Periasamy S, Chalmers NI, Du-Thumm L, Kolenbrander PE, Fusobacterium nucleatum ATCC 10953 requires Actinomyces naeslundii ATCC 43146 for growth on saliva in a three-species community that includes Streptococcus oralis 34, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 75 (2009) 3250–3257. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02901-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Palmer RJ, Shah N, Valm A, Paster B, Dewhirst F, Inui T, et al. , Interbacterial Adhesion Networks within Early Oral Biofilms of Single Human Hosts, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 83 (2017) e00407–17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00407-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Valm AM, Mark Welch JL, Rieken CW, Hasegawa Y, Sogin ML, Oldenbourg R, et al. , Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.a 108 (2011) 4152–4157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101134108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Kuboniwa M, Houser JR, Hendrickson EL, Wang Q, Alghamdi SA, Sakanaka A, et al. , Metabolic crosstalk regulates Porphyromonas gingivalis colonization and virulence during oral polymicrobial infection, Nat Microbiol 2 (2017) 1493–1499. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0021-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Zeng L, Burne RA, Sucrose-and Fructose-Specific Effects on the Transcriptome of Streptococcus mutans, as Determined by RNA Sequencing, Appl. Environ. Microbiol 82 (2016) 146–156. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02681-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Guo L, Hu W, He X, Lux R, McLean J, Shi W, investigating acid production by Streptococcus mutans with a surface-displayed pH-sensitive green fluorescent protein, PLoS ONE 8 (2013) e57182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Hwang G, Liu Y, Kim D, Sun V, Aviles-Reyes A, Kajfasz JK, et al. , Simultaneous spatiotemporal mapping of in situ pH and bacterial activity within an intact 3D microcolony structure, Sci Rep 6 (2016) 32841. doi: 10.1038/srep32841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Lamont RJ, Hajishengallis G, Polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis in inflammatory disease, Trends Mol Med 21 (2015) 172–183. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Jakubovics NS, Yassin SA, Rickard AH, Community interactions of oral streptococci, Adv. Appl. Microbiol 87 (2014) 43–110. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800261-2.00002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Džunková M, Martinez-Martinez D, Gardlík R, Behuliak M, Janšáková K, Jiménez N, et al. , Oxidative stress in the oral cavity is driven by individual-specific bacterial communities, NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 4 (2018) 29. doi: 10.1038/s41522-018-0072-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Head D, Devine DA, Marsh PD, In silico modelling to differentiate the contribution of sugar frequency versus total amount in driving biofilm dysbiosis in dental caries, Sci Rep 7 (2017) 17413. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17660-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H, Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments, Trends in Microbiology 26 (2018) 229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.09.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Xiao J, Klein MI, Falsetta ML, Lu B, Delahunty CM, Yates JR, et al. , The exopolysaccharide matrix modulates the interaction between 3D architecture and virulence of a mixed-species oral biofilm, PLoS Pathog 8 (2012) e1002623. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Stoodley P, Wefel J, Gieseke A, Debeer D, von Ohle C, Biofilm plaque and hydrodynamic effects on mass transfer, fluoride delivery and caries, J Am Dent Assoc 139 (2008) 1182–1190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Watson PS, Pontefract HA, Devine DA, Shore RC, Nattress BR, Kirkham J, et al. , Penetration of Fluoride into Natural Plaque Biofilms, J. Dent. Res 84 (2016) 451–455. doi: 10.1177/154405910508400510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Metwalli KH, Khan SA, Krom BP, Jabra-Rizk MA, Streptococcus mutans, Candida albicans, and the human mouth: a sticky situation, PLoS Pathog 9 (2013) e1003616. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Hajishengallis G, Immunomicrobial pathogenesis of periodontitis: keystones, pathobionts, and host response, Trends Immunol 35 (2014) 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Smith C, Kent RL, Microbial complexes in subgingival plaque, J. Clin. Periodontol 25 (1998) 134–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Chow J, Tang H, Mazmanian SK, Pathobionts of the gastrointestinal microbiota and inflammatory disease, Curr. Opin. Immunol 23 (2011) 473–480. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2011.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Dabdoub SM, Ganesan SM, Kumar PS, Comparative metagenomics reveals taxonomically idiosyncratic yet functionally congruent communities in periodontitis, Sci Rep 6 (2016) 38993. doi: 10.1038/srep38993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Marsh PD, Are dental diseases examples of ecological catastrophes? Microbiology (Reading, Engl.) 149 (2003) 279–294. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26082-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Rosier BT, De Jager M, Zaura E, Krom BP, Historical and contemporary hypotheses on the development of oral diseases: are we there yet? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4 (2014) 92. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ, Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: the polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology, Mol Oral Microbiol 27 (2012) 409–419. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00663.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Nowicki EM, Shroff R, Singleton JA, Renaud DE, Wallace D, Drury J, et al. , Microbiota and Metatranscriptome Changes Accompanying the Onset of Gingivitis, MBio 9 (2018) e00575–18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00575-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Olsen I, Lambris JD, Hajishengallis G, Porphyromonas gingivalis disturbs host-commensal homeostasis by changing complement function, J Oral Microbiol 9 (2017) 1340085. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1340085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Maekawa T, Krauss JL, Abe T, Jotwani R, Triantafilou M, Triantafilou K, et al. , Porphyromonas gingivalis manipulates complement and TLR signaling to uncouple bacterial clearance from inflammation and promote dysbiosis, Cell Host Microbe 15 (2014) 768–778. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Moutsopoulos NM, Moutsopoulos HM, The oral mucosa: A barrier site participating in tissue-specific and systemic immunity, Oral Dis 24 (2018) 22–25. doi: 10.1111/odi.12729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Takeuchi H, Hirano T, Whitmore SE, Morisaki I, Amano A, Lamont RJ, The serine phosphatase SerB of Porphyromonas gingivalis suppresses IL-8 production by dephosphorylation of NF-κB RelA/p65, PLoS Pathog 9 (2013) e1003326. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Darveau RP, Hajishengallis G, Curtis MA, Porphyromonas gingivalis as a potential community activist for disease, J. Dent. Res 91 (2012) 816–820. doi: 10.1177/0022034512453589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Murray JL, Connell JL, Stacy A, Turner KH, Whiteley M, Mechanisms of synergy in polymicrobial infections, J. Microbiol 52 (2014) 188–199. doi: 10.1007/s12275-014-4067-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Zijnge V, van Leeuwen MBM, Degener JE, Abbas F, Thurnheer T, Gmür R, et al. , Oral biofilm architecture on natural teeth, PLoS ONE 5 (2010) e9321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].ten Napel JH, Theilade J, Matsson L, Attström R, Ultrastructure of developing subgingival plaque in beagle dogs, J. Clin. Periodontol 12 (1985) 507–524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [97].Yost S, Duran-Pinedo AE, Teles R, Krishnan K, Frias-Lopez J, Functional signatures of oral dysbiosis during periodontitis progression revealed by microbial metatranscriptome analysis, Genome Med 7 (2015) 27. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0153-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [98].Kilian M, Chapple ILC, Hannig M, Marsh PD, Meuric V, Pedersen AML, et al. , The oral microbiome - an update for oral healthcare professionals, Br Dent J 221 (2016) 657–666. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [99].Kistler JO, Booth V, Bradshaw DJ, Wade WG, Bacterial community development in experimental gingivitis, PLoS ONE 8 (2013) e71227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [100].Kurgan S, Kantarci A, Molecular basis for immunohistochemical and inflammatory changes during progression of gingivitis to periodontitis, Periodontol. 2000 76 (2018) 51–67. doi: 10.1111/prd.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [101].Thurnheer T, Bostanci N, Belibasakis GN, Microbial dynamics during conversion from supragingival to subgingival biofilms in an in vitro model, Mol Oral Microbiol 31 (2016) 125–135. doi: 10.1111/omi.12108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [102].Cieplik F, Zaura E, Brandt BW, Buijs MJ, Buchalla W, Crielaard W, et al. , Microcosm biofilms cultured from different oral niches in periodontitis patients, J Oral Microbiol 11 (2019) 1551596. doi: 10.1080/20022727.2018.1551596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [103].Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ, Graves DT, The enduring importance of animal models in understanding periodontal disease, Virulence 6 (2015) 229–235. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.990806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [104].Luo TL, Eisenberg MC, Hayashi MAL, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Foxman B, Marrs CF, et al. , A Sensitive Thresholding Method for Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Image Stacks of Microbial Biofilms, Sci Rep 8 (2018) 13013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31012-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [105].Shrivastava A, Patel VK, Tang Y, Yost SC, Dewhirst FE, Berg HC, Cargo transport shapes the spatial organization of a microbial community, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.a 115 (2018) 8633–8638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808966115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [106].Gross EL, Beall CJ, Kutsch SR, Firestone ND, Leys EJ, Griffen AL, Beyond Streptococcus mutans: dental caries onset linked to multiple species by 16S rRNA community analysis, PLoS ONE 7 (2012) e47722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [107].Hajishengallis E, Parsaei Y, Klein MI, Koo H, Advances in the microbial etiology and pathogenesis of early childhood caries, Mol Oral Microbiol 32 (2017) 24–34. doi: 10.1111/omi.12152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [108].Holliday R, Preshaw PM, Bowen L, Jakubovics NS, The ultrastructure of subgingival dental plaque, revealed by high-resolution field emission scanning electron microscopy, BDJ Open 1 (2015) 15003. doi: 10.1038/bdjopen.2015.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
