Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stroke. 2019 Jul 5;50(8):2016–2022. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024838

Table 3.

Association Between Intensive BP Reduction and PHER, by Location.

Model Overall (n=780) Basal Ganglia (n=444) Thalamus (n=336)
β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p β (95% CI) p
Intensive BP Treatment, unadjusted −0.15 (−0.26 to −0.05) 0.007 −0.20 (−0.36 to −0.04) 0.02 −0.08 (−0.22 to 0.06) 0.23
Intensive BP Treatment, adjusted† −0.12 (−0.21 to −0.02) 0.03 −0.12 (−0.27 to 0.02) 0.09 −0.10 (−0.23 to 0.03) 0.13
Location*Intensive BP Treatment Interaction Term, adjusted† −0.02 (−0.22 to 0.19) 0.90 - - - -
†

Model adjusted for age, sex, time to baseline scan, admission ICH volume (natural log transformed), presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and volume of hematoma expansion.

Abbreviations: BP = blood pressure, CI = confidence interval