TABLE 2.
Regression parameter | Species and tissue type | α relaxation (onset) | β relaxation (peak) | β relaxation (onset) | γ relaxation (peak) |
Slope (°C g dw g–1 H2O) | Pea axes | −669±36b | −259±38d | −252±32d | −244±27d |
Soybean axes | −1029±50a | −21±35ns | −108±41e | −731±94b,1 | |
−161±54e,2 | |||||
Pea cotyledons | −452±28c | 3±28ns | −131±28e | −169±29e | |
Intercept | Pea axes | 88±2 | 49±3 | 16±2 | −42±2 |
(°C for wc = 0 g H2O g–1 dw) | Soybean axes | 115±2 | 37±2 | 12±2 | −27±3 |
−52±5 | |||||
Pea cotyledons | 95±2 | 30±2 | 7±2 | −37±3 |
1refers to the relationship at water content ≤0.05; 2refers to the relationship at water content ≥0.05; nsregression is not significant at P > 0.05. Data are from Figure 6. Regressions were significant (P < 0.05) except for moisture effects on the temperature of the β relaxation peak. Slopes marked with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). Analysis for pea cotyledons are provided for comparative purpose and come from Ballesteros and Walters (2011). The γ relaxations in soybean axes were analyzed for water contents above and below 0.05 g H2O g–1 dw.