TABLE 6.
SEM with latent variable interaction results: cyberbullying and face-to-face bullying.
Model | Cyberbullying | Face-to-face bullying | ||
Est. (SE) | Std. Est. | Est. (SE) | Std. Est. | |
Need for stimulation | 0.42 (0.21) | 0.27 | 0.26 (0.11) | 0.19 |
Avoidance of rest | 0.25 (0.12) | 0.16 | 0.11 (0.08) | 0.08 |
Perceived anonymity | −0.52 (0.22) | −0.17 | 0.01 (0.17) | −0.00 |
Perceived audience size | −0.10 (0.09) | −0.06 | 0.25 (0.09) | 0.17 |
Perceived lack of authorities | 0.16 (0.09) | 0.05 | −0.27 (0.14) | −0.11 |
Perceived immediacy of reactions by others | 0.10 (0.11) | 0.05 | −0.04 (0.08) | −0.03 |
Need for stimulation × perceived anonymity | −0.01 (0.17) | 0.04 | −0.16 (0.12) | −0.09 |
Avoidance of rest × perceived anonymity | −0.10 (0.13) | −0.06 | 0.08 (0.12) | 0.05 |
Need for stimulation × perceived audience size | −0.03 (0.09) | −0.03 | 0.03 (0.06) | 0.03 |
Avoidance of rest × perceived audience size | 0.02 (0.07) | 0.02 | −0.11 (0.07) | −0.11 |
Need for stimulation × perceived lack of authorities | −0.20 (0.14) | −0.11 | −0.05 (0.13) | −0.03 |
Avoidance of rest × perceived lack of authorities | 0.11 (0.13) | 0.06 | 0.21 (0.10) | 0.12 |
Need for stimulation × perceived immediacy of reactions by others | −0.09 (0.07) | −0.07 | 0.03 (0.07) | 0.03 |
Avoidance of rest × perceived immediacy of reactions by others | 0.00 (0.08) | 0.00 | −0.05 (0.11) | −0.05 |
Gender | 0.47 (0.33) | 0.21 | 0.41 (0.25) | 0.20 |
Age | −0.11 (0.09) | −0.11 | −0.07 (0.04) | −0.07 |
Social media use | 0.31 (0.16) | 0.19 | 0.14 (0.08) | 0.09 |
Model fit is not available in latent interaction models. Est., unstandardized estimate; SE, standard error; Std. Est., standardized estimate; gender is coded as 0 = females and 1 = males; statistically significant results at α = 0.05 are in boldface.