Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;10:895. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00895

TABLE 3.

Standardized beta coefficients from linear regression models on the associations of body composition measures with standard and corrected HRV parameters.

RMSSD pNN50 SDNN FFT TP FFT HF FFT LF FFT LF/HF
Model 1: Standard HRV parameters; Confounders: none
BMI (kg/m2) 0.207 0.240 –0.158 –0.117 0.214 –0.018 0.283*
WC (cm) –0.120 –0.148 –0.052 –0.042 –0.125 0.024 0.201
WC/Height –0.152 0.194 –0.076 –0.065 –0.146 –0.031 0.159
DXA FMI (kg/m2) 0.232 0.272* 0.203 –0.138 0.208 –0.042 0.250*
DXA BFP (%) 0.221 0.261* 0.220 –0.148 –0.168 –0.084 0.146
DXA FFMI (kg/m2) –0.062 –0.067 –0.005 –0.019 –0.122 0.048 0.225
DXA Total VAT (g) –0.048 –0.090 –0.019 –0.005 –0.054 0.069 0.121
DXA VAT FMI (g) –0.090 –0.134 –0.062 –0.036 –0.095 0.019 0.082
Model 2: Standard HRV parameters; Confounders: HR
BMI (kg/m2) –0.034 –0.058 0.003 0.046 –0.052 0.131 0.242
WC (cm) –0.003 –0.026 0.057 0.067 –0.015 0.122 0.168
WC/Height 0.095 0.063 0.158 0.169 0.086 0.179 0.094
DXA FMI (kg/m2) –0.028 –0.059 –0.015 0.055 –0.015 0.135 0.201
DXA BFP (%) –0.008 –0.039 –0.026 0.051 0.035 0.097 0.086
DXA FFMI (kg/m2) –0.039 –0.042 0.017 0.003 –0.099 0.068 0.218
DXA Total VAT (g) 0.050 0.013 0.075 0.100 0.043 0.132 0.092
DXA VAT FMI (g) 0.111 0.074 0.131 0.159 0.103 0.159 0.023
Model 3: Corrected HRV parameters; Confounders: years PHV offset
BMI (kg/m2) 0.026 –0.042 0.010 0.109 –0.014 0.140 0.198
WC (cm) 0.107 –0.006 0.101 0.156 0.065 0.129 0.112
WC/Height 0.108 0.004 0.114 0.179 0.069 0.168 0.114
DXA FMI (kg/m2) 0.012 –0.058 –0.018 0.117 0.016 0.136 0.163
DXA BFP (%) 0.012 –0.055 –0.036 0.105 0.058 0.085 0.061
DXA FFMI (kg/m2) 0.024 –0.011 0.040 0.033 –0.073 0.090 0.183
DXA Total VAT (g) 0.102 –0.020 0.062 0.121 0.058 0.117 0.089
DXA VAT FMI (g) 0.157 0.057 0.109 0.181 0.110 0.110 0.020

BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; FMI, fat mass index; BFP, body fat percentage, FFMI, fat-free mass index; VAT, visceral adipose tissue; PHV, peak height velocity. See full name of all the heart rate variability in time and frequency-domain (units in ms and ms2, respectively) parameters in Table 1. Confounders on the model were selected by stepwise regression analyses (i.e., all basic confounders considered in the three models were sex, PHV offset, parental education and wave). Additionally, mean HR was introduced as a confounder in the model 2. Stepwise analyses for confounders did not introduced any of the confounders tested in model 1, only mean HR in model 2 and PHV offset in model 3. Bold numbers indicate p < 0.05. *Indicates p < 0.01.