Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 25;27(3):505–512. doi: 10.1002/oby.22394

Table 2.

Logistic regression results: association between height and diabetes in Namibia, 2013

Characteristic Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P OR 95% CI P
Height (cm) 1.01 0.99‐1.03 0.45 0.99 0.97‐1.02 0.70 0.99 0.97‐1.02 0.47
Age (y) 1.05 1.03‐1.07 <0.001*** 1.05 1.02‐1.07 <0.001***
Sex
Male (ref.) 1 1
Female 0.84 0.60‐1.18 0.38 0.64 0.44‐0.92 0.022**
Education
None (ref.) 1 1
Primary 1.29 0.65‐2.56 0.47 1.29 0.65‐2.56 0.47
Secondary 1.41 0.72‐2.75 0.30 1.43 0.73‐2.79 0.30
Higher 1.60 0.73‐3.50 0.24 1.51 0.70‐3.27 0.30
Wealth index
Poorest 0.67 0.31‐1.44 0.31 0.81 0.38‐1.75 0.59
Poorer 0.64 0.30‐1.34 0.24 0.69 0.33‐1.48 0.34
Middle (ref.) 1 1
Richer 1.81 1.04‐3.23 0.037** 1.50 0.87‐2.60 0.15
Richest 2.17 1.17‐4.02 0.014** 1.61 0.86‐3.00 0.13
Residency
Urban (ref.) 1 1
Rural 0.82 0.50‐1.34 0.42 0.82 0.50‐1.35 0.43
BMI
Thin (<18.5) 1.13 0.58‐2.18 0.72
Normal (18.5‐25) (ref.) 1
Overweight (25‐29.9) 1.66 1.05‐2.61 0.030**
Obesity (>30.0) 2.98 1.92‐4.63 <0.001***
Observations 3,241 3,241 3,241

Estimates of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs of explanatory variables for diabetes obtained from logistic regression models. Sample includes women and men aged 35 to 64 included in 2013 Namibia Demographic and Health Survey.

**

P < 0.05.

***

P < 0.01.

Ref., reference category.