Table 2. Genera showing statistical differences in relative abundance (% sequences) when comparing DNA extracted directly from faeces or after exposure to ethidium monoazide (EMA).

Genera	Sample/treatment
	Basal	Basal/EMA	T1	T1/EMA	T3	T3/EMA	T6	T6/EMA
Faecalibacterium	6.16	0.06***	21.74	1.35***	27.46	0.45***	29.91	0.80***
Lachnospiraceae inc. sed.	5.33	0.05***	17.23	0.35***	7.60	0.52***	10.67	0.93***
Streptococcus	2.37	0.00***	0.15	0.01**	1.56	0.02***	0.53	0.04***
Blautia	2.26	0.01***	7.06	0.29***	5.24	0.20***	5.50	0.89***
Oscillibacter	1.81	0.00***	0.76	0.10***	0.82	0.02***	0.14	0.15
Roseburia	1.37	0.04***	1.26	0.17***	0.65	0.34*	3.71	0.36***
Clostridium cluster XVIII	1.14	0.22***	0.38	0.00***	0.08	0.00	0.07	0.00*
Doreaa	1.09	0.00***	0.32	0.00***	0.23	0.00**	0.35	0.00***
Clostridium cluster XIVaa	0.33	0.00***	0.09	0.00**	0.11	0.00*	0.16	0.00***
Coprococcus	0.11	0.01*	0.61	0.09***	1.79	0.04***	1.30	0.16***
Collinsella	0.00	0.00	3.16	0.13***	2.93	0.13***	7.22	0.30***
Sutterellaa	0.00	0.00	0.09	0.00**	1.45	0.00***	0.14	0.00**
Coriobacteriuma	0.00	0.00	0.12	0.00**	0.03	0.00	0.05	0.00

*p value <0.05; ** p value <0.01; *** p value <0.001.

^aGenera not detected by treating feacal samples with EMA before DNA extraction.

In bold, genera enriched after isoflavone ingestion, as compared to the basal sample. T1, T3 and T6 represent one, three and sixth months respectively of isoflavone supplementation.