Table 2.

Table listing which of 20 behaviors were significant for each of five lesion volume correction methods using support vector regression lesion‐symptom mapping

	Lesion volume correction method
Behavior under investigation	No correction	dTLVC	Regress on lesion	Regress on behavior	Regress on both
Philadelphia naming test (oral)	•	•		○	○
Philadelphia naming test (written)	•	•	○	○	○
Category fluency	•	•	○	○	○
Letter fluency	•	•	○	○	•
Western aphasia battery content	•	•	○	○	○
Western aphasia battery fluency	•	•	○	○	•
Backward digit span	•	•	○	○	○
Western aphasia battery repetition	•	•	○	○	○
Pseudoword repetition	•	•	○	○	•
Imageability effect (concrete minus abstract)	○	○	○	○	○
Regularity effect (regular minus exception)	•	•	•	○	•
Lexicality effect (word minus pseudoword)	○	○	○	○	○
Pyramids and palm trees	•	•	○	○	○
Western aphasia battery word recognition	•	•	○	○	•
Western aphasia battery yes/no	•	•	•	•	•
Picture pointing	•	•			○
BDAE complex ideational material	•	•	○	○	○
CLQT attention score	○	○	○		○
CLQT symbol trails score	○	○	○	○	○
Western aphasia battery sequential commands	•	•	○	○	•

A solid bullet (•) indicates that significant findings for a given combination of behavior and lesion volume correction method which survived voxelwise thresholding, p < .005 (one‐tailed) and clusterwise correction, p < .05 based on 10,000 permutations. An empty bullet (○) indicates that the analysis resulted in voxels that survived voxelwise thresholding but did not survive cluster correction.