Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 17;46(9):1840–1849. doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04377-6

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Challenges for 89Zr-immuno-PET tumor delineation and quantification. Example of 18F-FDG-PET (a) for a patient with a non-Hodgkin lymphoma showing intense tumor uptake (black arrow) and excellent contrast, while 89Zr-immuno-PET (b) with 89Zr-labelled-rituximab shows limited contrast for this tumor. Red arrows indicate uptake in blood vessels. Example of tumor delineation by two observers (observer 1 = blue line, observer 2 = black line) for 18F-FDG-PET (c) and 89Zr-immuno-PET (d). This example illustrates that excellent interobserver reproducibility (SUVmax = 10 for both observers) can be expected for 18F-FDG-PET, despite variability in tumor delineation. The limited tumor contrast for 89Zr-immuno-PET may result in substantial interobserver variability, even for SUVmax (a value of 2 and 3 for observers 1 and 2, respectively)