Table 2.
Hazard ratios of type 2 diabetes across quintiles of dietary patterns in 12,456 women and 8031 men from the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
| Quintiles of dietary patterns | Women | Men | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | |
| Health conscious | ||||
| 1 | 228/36,371 | 1.00 | 240/22,107 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 252/37,305 | 1.09 (0.91, 1.31) | 240/22,879 | 0.98 (0.81, 1.17) |
| 3 | 207/37,738 | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 234/23,070 | 0.95 (0.79–1.15) |
| 4 | 216/38,289 | 0.96 (0.79, 1.16) | 208/23,404 | 0.83 (0.68-1.00) |
| 5 | 167/37,756 | 0.75 (0.61–0.92) | 214/23,931 | 0.82 (0.68-1.00) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.003 | 0.01 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.003 | 0.01 | ||
| Low-fat products | ||||
| 1 | 173/37,574 | 1.00 | 196/22,663 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 198/37,726 | 1.03 (0.84, 1.26) | 225/22,876 | 1.07 (0.88, 1.30) |
| 3 | 218/38,000 | 0.75 (0.61, 0.92) | 213/23,584 | 0.98 (0.80, 1.19) |
| 4 | 208/37,648 | 1.02 (0.84, 1.26) | 235/22,898 | 1.10 (0.90, 1.33) |
| 5 | 273/37,845 | 1.19 (0.98, 1.45) | 267/23,368 | 1.15 (0.96, 1.40) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.10 | 0.12 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.24 | 0.10 | ||
| Dressing and vegetables | ||||
| 1 | 247/36,617 | 1.00 | 214/21,924 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 229/37,666 | 1.02 (0.85, 1.22) | 211/22,826 | 0.92 (0.76, 1.12) |
| 3 | 199/38,219 | 0.92 (0.76, 1.11) | 228/23,073 | 1.06 (0.87, 1.28) |
| 4 | 187/38,149 | 0.96 (0.79, 1.18) | 232/23,622 | 1.00 (0.82, 1.21) |
| 5 | 208/38,144 | 1.12 (0.91, 1.37) | 251/23,947 | 1.09 (0.90, 1.33) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.54 | 0.25 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.33 | 0.24 | ||
aAdjusted for age, season, diet method version, total energy intake, leisure time physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, education, and baseline BMI
bP trend per unit of the pattern factor