Table 3.
Hazard ratios of coronary events across quintiles of data driven dietary patterns in 12,456 women and 8031 men from the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
| Quintiles of dietary patterns | Women | Men | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | |
| Health conscious | ||||
| 1 | 141/37,355 | 1.00 | 229/22,762 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 121/38,277 | 0.90 (0.70, 1.16) | 198/23,642 | 0.82 (0.68, 1.00) |
| 3 | 96/38,843 | 0.72 (0.54, 0.94) | 190/23,964 | 0.79 (0.65, 0.96) |
| 4 | 108/39,233 | 0.83 (0.64, 1.09) | 191/24,021 | 0.80 (0.66, 0.98) |
| 5 | 101/39,789 | 0.77 (0.58, 1.02) | 196/24,365 | 0.83 (0.68, 1.01) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.054 | 0.07 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.03 | 0.02 | ||
| Low-fat products | ||||
| 1 | 111/38,107 | 1.00 | 191/23,285 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 97/38,633 | 0.91 (0.69, 1.19) | 198/23,653 | 1.11 (0.91, 1.35) |
| 3 | 119/39,065 | 1.11 (0.86, 1.44 | 180/24,496 | 1.00 (0.81, 1.22) |
| 4 | 107/38,610 | 0.98 (0.75, 1.28 | 236/23,334 | 1.32 (1.09, 1.61) |
| 5 | 133/39,084 | 1.18 (0.91, 1.52))) | 199/24,288 | 1.06 (0.87, 1.30 |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.17 | 0.19 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.10 | 0.12 | ||
| Dressing and vegetables | ||||
| 1 | 165/37,711 | 1.00 | 249/22,319 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 140/38,473 | 1.07 (0.85, 1.34) | 247/23,253 | 1.07 (0.90, 1.28) |
| 3 | 104/39,144 | 0.92 (0.72, 1.18) | 193/23.762 | 0.91 (0.75, 1.10) |
| 4 | 82/39,019 | 0.92 (0.69, 1.21) | 172/24,495 | 0.87 (0.71, 1.07) |
| 5 | 76/39,151 | 1.13 (0.84, 1.53) | 143/24,925 | 0.83 (0.66, 1.03) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.99 | 0.02 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.66 | 0.01 | ||
aAdjusted for age, season, diet method version, total energy intake, leisure time physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, education, and baseline BMI
bP trend per unit of the pattern factor