Table 4.
Hazard ratios of stroke across quintiles of data driven dietary patterns in 12,456 women and 8031 men from the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort
| Quintiles of dietary patterns | Women | Men | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | Cases/person years | HR with 95% CIs | |
| Health conscious | ||||
| 1 | 138/37,128 | 1.00 | 156/23,009 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 145/38,187 | 1.02 (0.81, 1.30) | 142/23,807 | 0.83 (0.66, 1.04) |
| 3 | 130/38,539 | 0.92 (0.72, 1.17) | 125/24,032 | 0.72 (0.56, 0.91) |
| 4 | 121/39,111 | 0.88 (0.68, 1.27) | 123/24,247 | 0.70 (0.55, 0.89) |
| 5 | 131/39,594 | 0.96 (0.75, 1.24) | 121/24,647 | 0.69 (0.54, 0.88) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.42 | 0.001 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.63 | 0.001 | ||
| Low-fat products | ||||
| 1 | 146/37,925 | 1.00 | 145/23,329 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 132/38,359 | 0.94 (0.74, 1.19) | 138/23,733 | 1.02 (0.80, 1.29) |
| 3 | 128/38,853 | 0.88 (0.70, 1.12) | 125/24,352 | 0.89 (0.70, 1.14) |
| 4 | 130/38,361 | 0.91 (0.72, 1.16) | 136/23,725 | 0.99 (0.78, 1.26) |
| 5 | 129/39,056 | 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) | 123/24,602 | 0.87 (0.68, 1.11) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.26 | 0.26 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.20 | 0.37 | ||
| Dressing and vegetables | ||||
| 1 | 192/37,412 | 1.00 | 168/22,622 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 165/38,242 | 1.03 (0.74, 1.27) | 143/23,497 | 0.96 (0.77, 1.21) |
| 3 | 130/38,910 | 0.96 (0.76, 1.20) | 136/23,880 | 0.98 (0.78, 1.24) |
| 4 | 100/38,929 | 0.88 (0.68, 1.14) | 121/24,633 | 0.97 (0.76, 1.25) |
| 5 | 78/39,066 | 0.95 (0.71, 1.27) | 99/25,109 | 0.91 (0.70, 1.19) |
| P trend across quintilesa | 0.38 | 0.59 | ||
| P trend, continuous scoreab | 0.62 | 0.33 | ||
aAdjusted for age, season, diet method version, total energy intake, leisure time physical activity, smoking, alcohol intake, education, and baseline BMI
bP trend per unit of the pattern factor