Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 15;190(3):589–604. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04433-w

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Increase in a shoot and b root dry weight (mean % ± SE), and c change in flower:leaf ratio (mean % ± SE) of Arabidopsis thaliana exposed temporary to fungal volatiles in vitro, and subsequently grown in soil for 2.5 weeks. Data are shown as relative to control plants; an increase of 0% in plant weight or ratio corresponds to the same weight or ratio as in control plants. Ci,  Chaetomium indicum; Fo47,  Fusarium oxysporum 47; For,  F. oxysporum f.sp. raphani; Mp,  Mucor plumbeus; Pl,  Phoma leveillei; Rs,  Rhizoctonia solani; Ss , Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; Tv,  Trichoderma viride; Ua,  Ulocladium atrum; Vd,  Verticillium dahliae; Vl,  Verticillium longisporum. Main effect of the volatile exposure was tested using one-sample Student’s t test (H0 = 0), and difference of plant weight increase in response to volatiles of different fungal pathogenicity was tested using two-sample Student’s t test at α = 0.05. Asterisks indicate statistical differences with the respective control plants (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001) using a one-sample Student’s t test (H0 = 0)