Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2017 Aug 30;108(2):126–139. doi: 10.7547/15-186

Table 3.

Frailty and Falls by Foot Pain, Peripheral Neuropathy, and Foot Deformity versus No Foot Problem

Variable Foot Pain >4
(n = 22)
Peripheral
Neuropathy
(n = 49)
Foot
Deformity
(n = 60)
≥2 Problems
(n = 31)
Frailty category
 Nonfrail Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Prefrail 2.1 (0.52–8.6) 3.2 (0.99–11) 2.0 (0.72–5.4) 4.6 (1.2–19)
 Frail 17.0 (1.6–181)a 13.3 (1.4–132)a 7.7 (0.86–68)b 27.8 (2.6–298)a,c
Weaknessd 17.9 (3.2–101)a 6.5 (1.3–33)a 6.2 (1.3–29)b 11.4 (2.1–61 )a
Exhaustion 9.7 (1.8–54)a 5.7 (1.1–28)a 3.9 (0.81–19) 9.1 (1.7–48)a
Slowness 1.2 (0.31–4.8) 1.4 (0.45–4.2) 1.0 (0.38–2.9) 1.3 (.41–4.3)
Low activity 1.5 (0.34–7.0) 1.2 (0.30–4.6) 1.4 (0.40–4.9) 1.9 (.48–7.9)
Mobility-Tiredness Scale score ≤5 3.3 (0.84–13) 1.3 (0.45–3.9) 1.1 (0.45–2.9) 2.6 (.79–8.4)
Falls Efficacy Scale-International score >25 13.3 (3.1–56)a 5.9 (1.8–19)a 5.0 (1.6–15)a 7.7 (2.2–27)a
History of falle 2.6 (0.76–9.0) 2.4 (0.81–7.2) 1.0 (0.39–2.8) 2.1 (0.65–6.4)
Fall incidence (incidence rate ratio [95% Cl])f 1.4(0.60–3.1) 1.4 (0.73–2.8) 1.3 (0.66–2.4) 1.5 (0.76–3.1)

Note: Participants with a foot problem can have more than one problem; the comparison group consisted of 27 participants with no foot problem. Odds ratios (95% Cls) are reported except where indicated otherwise, all adjusted for age.

Abbreviation: Cl, confidence interval.

a

Significantly increased (P < .05) odds versus those with no foot problem.

b

Linear trend over frailty categories: P < .05.

c

Linear trend over frailty categories: P < .01.

d

Fried criterion unintended weight loss odds ratio not defined due to no participants with weight lossandno foot problem.

e

History of at least one fall reported in the 6 months before baseline (eight participants missing fallhistory).

f

Incidence of falls during 6-month follow-up (eight dropouts missing fall incidence).