Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 16;10:1502. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01502

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the two training groups.

MAEVA©/RapDys© (N = 22) RapDys©/MAEVA© (N = 23) Difference Whole sample (N = 45)




Mean (SD) Mean (SD) F tests Mean (SD)
Age (months) 127 (17) 126 (16) F < 1 126 (16)
Reading age (months) 89 (7) 88 (10) F < 1 88 (8)
Reading delay (months) −38 (15) −38 (13) F < 1 −38 (14)
Phonemic perception (d’ score at 0 ms VOT) 1.4 (1.1) 1.6 (1.1) F < 1 1.5 (1.1)
Visual attention span
Raw score 73 (11) 72 (14) F < 1 72 (12)
Z-score −1.17 (1.0) −1.16 (1.1) F < 1 −1.16 (1.05)
Phonemic awareness
Raw score 75 (15) 69 (18) p = 0.245 71 (16)
Z-score −0.50 (0.9) −0.79 (1.0) p = 0.245 −0.65 (0.9)
Pseudo-word reading (wpm) 17 (8) 17 (9) F < 1 17 (8)
Regular word reading (wpm) 30 (16) 30 (19) F < 1 30 (18)
Irregular word reading (wpm) 16 (11) 16 (15) F < 1 16 (13)
Text reading (wpm) 64 (31) 66 (37) F < 1 65 (34)