Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 18;4(4):7054–7060. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00391

Table 1. Effect of Different Catalysts on HMF Conversion and DFF Yield in AcOHa.

entry catalyst, loading (mol %) T (°C) time (h) conv. HMF (%) yield DFF (%) select.b (%)
1 Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, 5 RT 8 100 93 93
2 Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, 5 50 5 100 95 95
3 Fe(NO3)3·9H2O, 2 50 5 84 78 93
4   50 5 2 1 50
5 Fe(acac)3, 5 50 24 2 1 50
6 FeCl3·6H2O, 5 50 24 2 1 50
7 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 5 50 5 81 80 99
8 Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, 7.5 50 5 100 99 99
9 Al(NO3)3·9H2O, 5 50 5 95 93 98
10 Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, 5 50 5 78 72 92
11 Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, 7.5 50 5 100 97 97
12 KNO3, 10 50 5 49 57 96
13 KNO3, 15 50 5 64 61 95
14 NaNO3, 10 50 5 51 49 96
15 NaNO3, 15 50 5 64 62 97
16 HNO3, 5 50 5 72 71 99
17 HNO3, 15 50 5 100 98 98
a

Reaction conditions: HMF (1 mmol, 126 mg), TEMPO (0.05 mmol, 7.8 mg), 50 °C, AcOH (2 mL), and oxygen balloon; the conversion and yield were determined by HPLC. Conv. = conversion. Select. = selectivity.

b

S (DFF) = yield (DFF)/conversion (HMF).