Table 2. Comparative Study of Operating Parameters of the Present Junction with Other Published Data.
| sample | bias (V) | detectable illumination | responsivity (mA/W) | reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ti/TiO2 NW/Pt | 5 | 390 nm | 7 × 10–2 | Tsai et al.54 |
| FTO/TiO2 NR/polyfluorene/Au | 5 | UV light (3.6 mW/cm2) | 3 | Han et al.55 |
| FTO/TiO2 NRs cloths/FTO | –1 | 365 nm (1.25 mW/cm2) | 17 | Wang et al.56 |
| FTO/TiO2 NR/PFH/Au | 0 | 365 nm (3.2 mW/cm2) | 14 | Han et al.57 |
| 395 nm | 33 | |||
| p-Si(111)/TiO2 NRs/platinum | 5 | 365 nm (2.3 mW/cm2) | 70 | Selman et al.58 |
| Ti sheet/hydrogenated TiO2 NTs | 0.7 | solar light (100 mW/cm2) | 1.2 | Wei et al.59 |
| visible light (100 mW/cm2) | 0.3 | |||
| Au/TiO2 NR/Au (S3) | –4 | 350 nm (0.57 mW/cm2) | 4.2 × 102 | this work |
| 400 nm (0.88 mW/cm2) | 7.1 × 102 | |||
| 470 nm (1.28 mW/cm2) | 68 | |||
| 570 nm (0.76 mW/cm2) | 78 |