Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 16;4(1):1364–1374. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b03084

Table 2. Comparative Study of Operating Parameters of the Present Junction with Other Published Data.

sample bias (V) detectable illumination responsivity (mA/W) reference
Ti/TiO2 NW/Pt 5 390 nm 7 × 10–2 Tsai et al.54
FTO/TiO2 NR/polyfluorene/Au 5 UV light (3.6 mW/cm2) 3 Han et al.55
FTO/TiO2 NRs cloths/FTO –1 365 nm (1.25 mW/cm2) 17 Wang et al.56
FTO/TiO2 NR/PFH/Au 0 365 nm (3.2 mW/cm2) 14 Han et al.57
395 nm 33
p-Si(111)/TiO2 NRs/platinum 5 365 nm (2.3 mW/cm2) 70 Selman et al.58
Ti sheet/hydrogenated TiO2 NTs 0.7 solar light (100 mW/cm2) 1.2 Wei et al.59
visible light (100 mW/cm2) 0.3
Au/TiO2 NR/Au (S3) –4 350 nm (0.57 mW/cm2) 4.2 × 102 this work
400 nm (0.88 mW/cm2) 7.1 × 102
470 nm (1.28 mW/cm2) 68
570 nm (0.76 mW/cm2) 78