Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Aug 15;81(5):572–577. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002075

Table 2.

Outcomes by regimen type for people living with HIV who were previously treatment-naive and those who were treatment-experienced

Characteristic Treatment-Naive Patients
(N = 1280)
Treatment-Experienced Patients
(N = 3897)
Dolutegravir-
baseda (N=426)
Other
INSTI-
basedb
(N=773)
Darunavir-
based
(N=81)
P value
across
regimens
Dolutegravir-
based (N=2054)
Other
INSTI-
based
(N=1486)
Darunavir-
based
(N=357)
P value
across
regimens
Duration of follow-up, mean (SD), days 342 (283) 494 (353) 564 (422) <0.001 367 (286) 430 (336) 436 (341) <0.001
Remained on regimen, N (%) 316 (74) 601 (78) 64 (79) 0.3 1526 (74) 1018 (69) 212 (59) <0.001
Experienced virologic failure,
(≥400 copies/mL)
N (%)
28 (7) 93 (12) 23 (28) <0.001 115 (6) 152 (10) 75 (21) <0.001
Died, N (%) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Discontinued regimen, N (%) 44 (10) 79 (10) 4 (5) 0.3 226 (11) 192 (13) 66 (18) <0.001
Switched regimen (all changes), N (%) 66 (15) 93 (12) 13 (16) 0.2 302 (15) 276 (19) 79 (22) <0.001
Switched from regimen (but remained in category), N (%) 21 (32) 1 (1) 0 (0) <0.001 55 (18) 15 (5) 0 (0) <0.001
Switched regimen (switch resulted in new category), N (%) 45 (68) 92 (99) 13 (100) <0.001 247 (82) 261 (95) 79 (100) <0.001

INSTI = integrase strand transfer inhibitor; SD = standard deviation.

a

This includes dolutegravir/abacavir/emtricitabine and dolutegravir/tenofovir/emtricitabine

b

This includes elvitegravir/cobicistat/tenofovir/emtricitabine and raltegravir/tenofovir/emtricitabine