Table 2.

Mean, standard deviation, and statistical tests indicating depth sensitivity and preferences in all ROIs for Experiment 1, collapsed across stimulus category. N = 16. Bold text on the planned pairwise comparisons reflects the depth condition with significantly greater activation.

ROI	Back	Middle	Front	Statistical Tests
FFA	0.57 (0.25)	0.57 (0.28)	0.60 (0.29)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 2.085, p = 0.142, η2 = 0.122
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 41.902, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.736 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 0.994, p = 0.444, η2 = 0.062
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 0.240, p = 0.814, d = 0.060
				Back-Front: t(15) = 1.739, p = 0.102, d = 0.435
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 2.338, p = 0.034, d = 0.585 *
OFA	0.85 (0.35)	0.86 (0.36)	0.89 (0.39)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 3.547, p = 0.041, η2 = 0.191 *
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 41.464, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.734 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 0.920, p = 0.503, η2 = 0.058
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 0.258, p = 0.800, d = 0.064
				Back-Front: t(15) = 2.119, p = 0.051, d = 0.530
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 2.352, p = 0.033, d = 0.588 *
LOC	0.84 (0.31)	0.84 (0.30)	0.91 (0.38)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 5.820, p = 0.007, η2 = 0.280 *
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 110.789, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.88 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 1.501, p = 0.164, η2 = 0.091
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 0.121, p = 0.905, d = 0.030
				Back-Front: t(15) = 2.923, p = 0.011, d = 0.731 **
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 2.328, p = 0.034, d = 0.582 *
PPA	0.25 (0.20)	0.21 (0.14)	0.25 (0.23)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 2.893, p = 0.071, η2 = 0.162
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 31.442, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.677 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 2.337, p = 0.023, η2 = 0.135*
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 2.490, p = 0.025, d = 0.623 *
				Back-Front: t(15) = 0.028, p = 0.978, d = 0.007
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 1.589, p = 0.133, d = 0.397
OPA	0.48 (0.21)	0.42 (0.20)	0.50 (0.24)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 6.586, p = 0.004, η2 = 0.305 *
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 30.789, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.672 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 1.702, p = 0.105, η2 = 0.102
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 3.415, p = 0.004, d = 0.854 **
				Back-Front: t(15) = 0.965, p = 0.350, d = 0.241
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 2.642, p = 0.018, d = 0.661 *
RSC	−0.04 (0.08)	−0.04 (0.12)	−0.03 (0.08)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 0.661, p = 0.523, η2 = 0.042
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 21.355, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.587 *
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 1.446, p = 0.184, η2 = 0.088
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 0.460, p = 0.652, d = 0.115
				Back-Front: t(15) = 0.947, p = 0.358, d = 0.237
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 0.924, p = 0.370, d = 0.231
MT+	0.68 (0.37)	0.75 (0.41)	0.80 (0.45)	Depth: F(2, 30) = 18.530, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.553 *
				Stimulus: F(4, 60) = 2.083, p = 0.094, η2 = 0.122
				Interaction: F(8, 120) = 2.726, p = 0.009, η2 = 0.154*
				Planned Pairwise Depth Comparisons
				Back-Middle: t(15) = 4.025, p = 0.001, d = 1.006 **
				Back-Front: t(15) = 4.621, p < 0.001, d = 1.155 **
				Middle-Front: t(15) = 3.579, p = 0.003, d = 0.895 **

^*denotes statistical significance at p < 0.05.

^**denotes statistical significance at p < 0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected for multiple post-hoc comparisons).