Table 2: Distribution of paraphasia types by task.

The CS (connected speech) and PNT (naming) task groups are shown on the left. The CS+PNT subgroup, comprised of individuals who had both a connected speech and naming assessment, is shown on the right. Recall that the percentage of paraphasias was calculated a proportion of total nouns for the connected speech task and as a proportion of total overt attempts for the naming task. Significant difference between the distributions of paraphasias during connected speech and naming was calculated only for the CS+PNT subgroup, as this was a direct comparison between individuals who completed both tasks.

Task Groups	CS Task Group M (SD) %	PNT Task Group M (SD) %	CS+PNT subgroup M (SD) %
Task Types Paraphasia Types	Connected Speech	Naming	Connected Speech	Naming	Multinomial logistic regression significance
Neologistic	6.03 (11.42)	6.89 (19.04)	9.00 (13.75)	6.97 (15.50)	p=.13
Phonemic	6.49 (8.93)	4.69 (7.77)	8.22 (9.66)	9.06 (9.90)	p=.48
Semantically Related	0.72 (1.21)	8.89 (9.94)	0.83 (1.25)	8.89 (8.28)	p=.001**
Unrelated	3.27 (5.38)	3.26 (5.10)	4.75 (5.80)	2.50 (3.63)	p=.015*

^*Indicates a significant difference from the multinomial logistic regression analysis performed on the CS+PNT subgroup.