Table 5.
Class | Category | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | OR | 95% CI | p | |||||||
Sex | Male | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.37 | 1.13 | 1.66 | 0.002 | 1.30 | 1.06 | 1.59 | 0.011 | 1.47 | 1.19 | 1.82 | 0.000 |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Female | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.00 | 0.85 | 1.18 | 0.969 | 0.99 | 0.83 | 1.18 | 0.915 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 1.33 | 0.244 | |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Age | 19–39 | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.05 | 0.75 | 1.48 | 0.768 | 1.15 | 0.79 | 1.67 | 0.481 | 1.22 | 0.83 | 1.80 | 0.312 |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
40–59 | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.07 | 0.88 | 1.32 | 0.499 | 1.08 | 0.87 | 1.34 | 0.512 | 1.19 | 0.95 | 1.50 | 0.123 | |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
60≦ | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.23 | 1.03 | 1.47 | 0.020 | 1.15 | 0.96 | 1.38 | 0.041 | 1.31 | 1.08 | 1.58 | 0.006 | |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
Type of medical | TM | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 0.91 | 0.68 | 1.22 | 0.554 | 0.83 | 0.61 | 1.14 | 0.261 | 0.9 | 0.65 | 1.23 | 0.517 |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
WM | Non-covered treatment | Yes | 1.22 | 1.06 | 1.40 | 0.004 | 1.19 | 1.02 | 1.37 | 0.019 | 1.33 | 1.15 | 1.55 | 0.000 | |
No | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Notes: Logistic regression analysis with complex sampling design was performed by adjusting for covariates. Odds ratios indicates odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval. Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age, and marital status. Model 2 was adjusted by Model 1 variables + economic activity, monthly income, medical insurance type, private insurance, and non-covered treatment. Model 3 was adjusted by Model 2 variables + chronic disease, disability, regular exercise, pain, self-rated health status, and depression. Abbreviations: TM, Korean traditional medicine; WM, Western medicine; OR, odds ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.